FIRST QUESTION
The history of Canada isn't very long compared with other areas of the world that are heavily populated today. Archaeologists haven't found fossils any older than around 30,000 years old, which probably indicates there were no earlier forms of humans in Canada as there were in Africa, for instance. Of course, the weather wasn't very hospitable to people because the last ice age only ended several thousand years ago. Meanwhile, complex societies based on agriculture were developing in Mexico.
Answer:
it builds suspense about the war in the play.
Explanation:
The above excerpt talks about how the narrator is requesting the monarchs to behold their eyes for something great that is going to happen soon. It grandly introduces the entrance of King Henry into the war but does not foretell what is actually going to happen.
It helps in creating a suspense in the minds of the readers as to what will happen to the war once King Henry takes part in it. Therefore, the statement that best describes the purpose of this excerpt of the prologue is "it builds suspense about the war in the play."
Answer:
Based on the transcript, Welles most likely trying to : Option A: Present a message about how trustful people are of media.
Explanation:
When War of Worlds was broadcast, people listening to the radio across the U.S. heard a report of some creatures and war machines entering New York City. But this was not a real news bulletin. It was 'Orson Welles' version of the H. G. Wells classic novel "The War of the Worlds." People began to get panic with the news specially at some moments as Welles even used special elements including music break, bulletins which made this broadcast very successful and a huge public attention.
This shows that people trust media.
I'd say the answer is B, its just the most logical in my opinion. Plus its true.
Because if you are ever doing research, for instance when you have to turn in your thesis for your PhD, you have to pass peer review. Also intellectual data that is not yours has to be properly cited otherwise it is considered academic dishonesty.