Answer:
<em><u>can</u></em><em><u>'t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>se</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>too</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>sm</u></em><em><u>all</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ta</u></em><em><u>lk</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>shot</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>lit</u></em><em><u>tle</u></em><em><u> bit</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>clo</u></em><em><u>se</u></em>
Answer:
shoulda woulda coulda been B
Step-by-step explanation:
The sequence forms a Geometric sequence as the rule to obtain the value for the next term is by ratio
Term 1: 1000
Term 2: 200
Term 3: 40
From term 1 to term 2, there's a decrease by

From term 2 to term 3, there's a decrease also by

The rule to find the

term in a sequence is

, where

is the first term in the sequence and

is the ratio
So, the formula for the sequence in question is

term =

The sequence is a divergent one. We can always find the value of the next term by dividing the previous term by 5 and if we do that, the value of the next term will get closer to 'zero' but never actually equal to zero.
We can find a partial sum of the sequence using the formula

for -1<r<1
Substituting

and

we have

=

= 1250
Hence, the correct option is option number 1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
7
2
Decimal Form:
3.5
Mixed Number Form:
3
12
I used a graphing calculator for this.
The solution my calculator got was:
(-2.625, 0.688) My calculator is very accurate, I don't think the test expects it to be like that.
Let's find the closest coordinates.
"B" is the closest.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers