1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena-s [515]
3 years ago
9

In the textbook, Sternberg identified four fallacies in thinking that otherwise smart people make. Which fallacy is consistent w

ith the following statement, "I don't need to quit smoking; the statistics about smoking don't apply to me since I exercise all the time."?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Stells [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The omnipotence fallacy

Explanation:

The omnipotence paradox or fallacy arise if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome or result and even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. This family of fallacies hinges on the understanding of the word "omnipotent" which is the nature of God.

The most well-known version of the omnipotence paradox is the paradox of the stone "Could God create a stone so heavy that even He could not lift it? This phrasing of the omnipotence paradox is vulnerable to objections based on the physical nature of gravity, such as how the weight of an object depends on what the local gravitational field is. Other statements of the paradox that do not involve such difficulties include "If given the axioms of Euclidean geometry, can an omnipotent being create a triangle whose angles do not add up to 180 degrees?" and "Can God create a prison so secure that he cannot escape from it

Relating this to the question, smart think that they are all powerful and they can do whatever they want and will not come to any harm. This is a case of omnipotent fallacy. He feels all powerful.

And believes that because he exercises, smoking (which is dangerous to health) will not cause him any harm, and hence he shouldn't be in the statistics of smokers.

Bess [88]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Omnipotence Fallacy

Explanation:

Omnipotence Fallacy, is a kind of fallacy committed by those people who believe that  an omnipotent being can unilaterally bring about any logically possible state of affairs, such that the individual believes that he or she is all powerful and can do whatever he wants.

Hence, in this case, the argument is considered to be consistent with Omnipotence fallacy, because it is based upon the implicit, but false, assumption that doing exercise all the time, makes him not to need to quit smoking.

You might be interested in
What was at bastille at the time of the attacks
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

The Bastille held a large cache of ammunition and gunpowder, and was also known for holding political prisoners whose writings had displeased the royal government, and was thus a symbol of the absolutismof the monarchy. As it happened, at the time of the attack in July 1789, there were only seven inmates, none of great political significance.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Colville Indian Reservation makes up part of the population of the region.
iren [92.7K]
China because it’s in Asia
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which city was the site of his Little white house in Georgia
zaharov [31]

Warm Springs, Georgia was the site of President Franklin D Roosevelt's "Little White House".

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe several inventions of the Industrial Revolution and their impact on society. (Site 2)
ratelena [41]

Answer:

Steam engine, Sewing machine, spinning jenny, flying shuttle, and water frame. The impact on society was good because of all the inventions and how they helped people.

Explanation:

Even though it was back then their inventions led us to learn how to make more things.

4 0
3 years ago
How would you refute the following argument?
meriva

Answer:

Imagehttps://link.springer.com › article

Refutation by Parallel Argument | SpringerLink

Dec 9, 2008 — I suggest the following argument structure for refutation by parallel arguments: (1). The Analogue(A) ...

People also ask

How do you refute an argument?

Four Step Refutation

Step One: Signal. Identify the claim you are answering. ...

Step Two: State. Make your (counter) claim. ...

Step Three: Support. Reference evidence or explain the justification. ...

Step Four: Summarize. Explain the importance of your argument.

Explanation:

I hope it's help u :)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the consequences of repartimiento? Check all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • How did the French and Indian War play a role in causing the American Revolution?
    14·1 answer
  • What factors limit the impact of the mass media on American Politics?
    14·1 answer
  • Although his brother dropped out of college after becoming dependent on marijuana, Jonah thinks that if he starts smoking mariju
    8·2 answers
  • "The commander and his staff must work to clearly display objectives and end states by phase, demonstrating explicitly their inc
    7·1 answer
  • What does it mean to be a good citizen? Why is this important?
    11·1 answer
  • In three to five sentences summarize the state of Imperial Russia prior to the Revolution in 1917.
    11·1 answer
  • What was the primary reason colonist resented new taxes ​
    7·2 answers
  • What does the term democracy mean<br>​
    7·2 answers
  • The authors of the Articles of Confederation wanted to provide a way for the states to work together. But they did not want to f
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!