Explanation:
A. Environmental Sources of Stress:
It is the stressors arising from environmental factors that can threaten the employee's work in some way.
2- Economic uncertalinty
5- Technological change
B. Organizational Sources of Stress:
This stress derives from internal or external conflicts that can occur at work, such as personal charges and poor relationships with other employees.
1. Task demands
4. Interpersonal demands
C. Personal Sources of Stress:
These are the stressors arising from the employee's personal life, which can directly impact the quality with which the employee performs his work.
3. Economic problems
6. Family problems
Because if everyone went and had the same job no one else would know how to do the other jobs causing our entire economy to fail and entire city’s failing too.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Choices that are the best for more than one person are said to be in the social interest.
Explanation:
The social interest is a concept sufficiently clarified in Company Law. The Capital Companies Law refers to it in terms of challenging social agreements: if an agreement is not in accordance with the corporate interest, it can be challenged. It is only negatively contested, that is, if the plaintiff can argue that the agreement is contrary to the social interest, so that it is not a validity requirement that the agreement be in accordance with the social interest. Likewise, if the administrators act against the social interest when they exercise their discretionary powers, they incur responsibility for violation of their duty of loyalty.
Answer:
the value of good increases (goes up)
