The correct answer is - Competition to develop strong economies and build large empires.
There were lots of tensions in Europe about the shares that each colonial country had on the other continents were the natural resources were abundant. While some considered that they had won this territories fair and square, others were on the opinion that they should get some of the colonies under their control. The background of this was of course the economy, and the competition between the nations to be wealthier, military stronger, and enlarge their territories. Unfortunately, these tensions led to a World War.
You can send it to the school
andrew Jackson
Dubbed the people's president, was the first president to extensively use veto leaders and asserts the presidency as a strong leader. Jackson reasserted the authority of the federal government by by facing down south carolina's nullification of a federal tariff law.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
Nationalism began to grow and spread.
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
The conference was led by Prince Klemens von Metternich of Austria. Its purpose was to reestablish peace and stability in Europe. It also focused on the containment of the Russian empire because Poland was divided up between Austria, Prussia, and Russia. So in this way nationalism began to grow and spread throughout Austria and Europe.
In the early days of British colonization, the British gave the colonists a lot of self governing powers and autonomy, and it remained this way for several years. However, when King George III took power he tightened the grip on their colonies a lot more, which created some tensions. One big thing was after the French and Indian War, the British heavily taxed the colonists with things like the Stamp Act because it has cost the British government a lot of money to defend the colonies in the. This angered a lot of colonists because they were getting taxed without consent in that they have no representation in Parliament. Although other British colonies also did not have representation, the colonists felt that they were just as valid as British citizens as those in GB, so they were angry that they had to pay all these taxes without agreeing to them. Hence the phrase "no taxation without representation"
