The correct answer is "Criterion validity."
The option that determines this relationship is <em>criterion validity.</em>
When using criterion validity, Patagonia tries to assess a potential employee’s capability within the standards of the organization. The managers of the company want to determine how well they predict a potential employee’s actual job performance based on scores on the employee’s selection procedure.
This statistical method -criteria validity- tries to identify how well a measure validates or predicts an outcome of another measure. In a company, the Human Resources Department applies this test to a candidate as part of the interview mechanism to confirm that he/she would be the right candidate for the job.
Answer:
Case-Control Study
Explanation:
A case–control study is a type of observational study in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute
Answer:
I'm from Maryland but I live in Virginia. And I like my family. :)
One thing is the power of it if its faster it erodes more if its slower doesn't really erode anything
i don't know the other two things but hope this will help you
Answer:
A. arbitration.
Explanation:
Arbitration refers to the private process in which a conflict is brought before one or more arbitrators who make a final decision on it, by consent of the parties. The parties rather than going to court, agree for an alternate dispute settlement method when selecting arbitration. the condition of the arbitration requires both parties to agree to it and select the arbitrator with mutual consent. As per the question, Joe and Stan agreed to involve a third party to settle their difference is an example of arbitration.
