The answer to this question is answer choice C.
For the SSS postulate, we need 3 pairs of congruent sides. However, in the image, there are only 2 pairs.
The missing pair in the image is AC and DF. If those are congruent, the triangle can be proven congruent by the SSS postulate.
Hope this helps! :)
~AgentCozmo4, Junior Moderator
What statement are you talking about?
Answer: C. (x2 - 5)(x + 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Prime
Step-by-step explanation:
