Answer:
At the state level, there is a Governor in whom the executive power of the State is vested by the Constitution. But the Governor acts as a nominal head, and the real executive powers are exercised by the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister. The Governor of a State is appointed by the President of India.
Explanation:
The U.S was no longer directly involved in conflicts against communist
forces in South-East Asia. In addition to this were border disputes between the Chinese and Soviet
Union. The bigger threat to China
now appeared to be the Soviet Union, not the USA. At that time, the cold war was entering a period of detente in which relationships
between the US and Communist powers changed. China stood to benefit
from improving relations. China needed export markets for her industrial goods and improved relations
with the US would enable this. Therefore, They agreed to cooperate to build a good relationship so that they could export products into the U.S.
Answer: false.
Explanation:
The statement above(that is, in the question) is not true because of the following reasons;
===> Collective Behavior is an irrational Behavior or say, an unstructured behaviour exhibit by a group of people. The Behavior is somewhat spontaneous.
Let me give you an instance of a collective Behavior so that you will be able to get the main idea here. Suppose you are in a conference Hall, composing many people or let us say a large Auditorium for a concert, and unfortunately there was a fire outbreak. Everyone seek to get out of the hall, on the way of getting out, you might(for humanity sake) decide to help others escape too, that is COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR- Spontaneous reactions.
===>The civil Rights movement in the 1950s can not be termed as a collective Behavior. The movements were organized and structured to accomplish a particular set of goals.
In the example provided, a model is built with the aim of explain certain behaviours of individuals who pertain for a classroom, let's assume we are speaking about a high school scenario and a class of teenagers. Data is gathered only from the male students.
When including age as an explanatory variable in a regression equation, it is very likely that it produces a causal effect on the dependent variable, but also on many of the other regressors, and hence it will be 'contaminating' the effects quantified for those.
A possible solution to avoid this inconvenience could be to gather again the same data 10 years later, and to build a new regression function. In the end, it is necessary to use an estimation method which compares the old and new regressions, to conclude in which extent has time (=age) affected each of the regressors, in order to isolate the effect of time on the regressors, from the pure effect that each regressor causes on the dependent variable. Like this, we are able to know the real effect of each regressor on the dependent variable, that is the ultimate goal of the model.
A possible estimator to use in this scenario is the so-called 'difference in differences' model.
