Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
President Richard Nixon proposed the development of the Environmental Protection Agency
This is of course a very complex question that does not have a definitive answer, but 1850s would be a good decade to start counting as "Modern". This was a decade of the telegraph and Darwin's The Origin of Species.
<span />
Answer:
<u>b. no, this does not need to be reported since it is unrelated to participation in the study.</u>
Explanation:
The research in conducting a focus group to learn about hygiene and disease prevention but the subject having a heart attack does't count as part of the research.
I believe the answer is: <span>Forensic human service providers
</span><span>Forensic human service providers main duty is to determine whether the accusation regarding domestic violence is true.
Their method is constructed in a way that minimize the likelihood for the children to be traumatised in the process, and identify the victim who choose to say that the violence never happened due to overwhelming fear toward the perpetrator.</span>
