The explanation for this is one of my favorite pieces of mathematical reasoning. First, let's thing about distance; what's the shortest distance between two points? <em>A straight line</em>. If we just drew a straight line between A and B, though, we'd be missing a crucial element of the original problem: we also need to pass through a point on the line (the "river"). Here's where the mathemagic comes in.
If we take the point B and <em>reflect it over the line</em>, creating the point B' (see picture 1), we can draw a line straight from A to B' that passes through a point on the line. Notice the symmetry here; the distance from the intersection point to B' is<em> the same as its distance to B</em>. So, if we reflect that segment back up, we'll have a path to B, and because it came from of the line segment AB', we know that it's <em>the shortest possible distance that includes a point on the line</em>.
If we apply this same process to our picture, we see that the line segment AB' crosses the line
at the point (1, 1)
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:yes
Answer:
It would be 3 because 3×4=12
(4 goes into 12 3 times)
If the two angles form a linear pair, the sum of the angles is 180 degrees.
If the small angle is one-third of the other, then the total is 1+1/3=4/3 of the larger angle.
By proportion,
L+L/3=4L/3=180
L=180*3/4=135 degrees
Smaller angle = L/3=45 degrees
Check: L+L/3=135+45=180 degrees, ok