Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
The Bull Moose Party (also called the Progressive Party) was started by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912, just after the Republican Party has split up between Roosevelt and Howard Taft.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Iceberg Principle states that we can not always see or detect most data that pertains to a specific situation. I believe that - to a marketing manager - this should mean that they can not always gather all the data or predict everything about a situation, instead they must use the data that they do have in order to make the most informed decision possible for achieving their goals.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
she generalized the data.
Explanation:
According to my research on different research methods, I can say that based on the information provided within the question she generalized the data. This can be said because based on the situation it seems that the researcher used the women's experiences to construct a generalized consensus and form an overall conclusion.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<span> both had energetic and capable founders/early rulers. Both had capable militaries, both had same beliefs. </span>
