Answer:
Euthyphro dilemma.
Explanation:
<u>Euthyphro dilemma</u> was introduced in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro. In this dialogue Socrates asks Euthyphro about the piety - a virtue that includes spiritual devotion and humility. Socrates asks <u>if piety ‘is loved by gods because it is piety, or it is piety because it is loved by gods?’</u>.
Applying this dilemma to the modern legal matters, the professor Myres S. McDougal from the Yale Law School asked if the property rights are protected because they are property rights, or they are rights because we protect them. Fundamentally this question asks if property rights are natural or given.
<em>
This</em> <em>dilemma can be addressed to various matters to identify if this matter has true value in itself, or only because something says so</em>.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows.
Carl and Sadie, who are neighbors, got into a disagreement about early morning noise on the weekends. The two came to an agreement: Carl promised to not mow the lawn before 10 a.m., and Sadie promised to put bark collars on her dogs in the early morning hours. Their promises represent the ________ in their agreement.
A. Flaw
B. Consideration
C. Legal competency
D. Undue influence
Answer:
B. Consideration.
Explanation:
In an agreement or in a contract, consideration refers to the bargaining for mutual exchange of values. In other words, consideration refers to what each person involved expects to gain from the agreement. In this case, Carl expects Sadie's dog to stop barking, while Sadie expects Carl to not mow the lawn before 10 a.m.
The homestead act is all I can think of it’s not really a policy but an offer
1. A. a group of influential people
Under a system of trial by jury, both the defendants and the accuser are required to present their case in front of a group of influential people known as the Juries. After hearing each presentation, the juries would give their vote to determine whether the defendant is guilty or not.
2. B. innocent until proven guilty
This legal principle require the law establishments and medias to not treat a defendant as if he/she is guilty before the court deliver its verdict.
The court need to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt before it can give punishments for the defendants and let the media tarnish their name.
3. A. equality under the law
This legal principle was directly adopted not long after Abraham Lincoln emancipated the slaves and initiate reconstruction on southern states. He wanted that all racial minorities in united states to be treated as any other citizens.
4. C. rule of law
According to this principle, when deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not, the court should follow on rules that written under the law rather than use their emotion. Regardless of their personal opinion, a judge should always treat every case as instructed in the written law.
