Kohlberg suggested a cognitive-developmental view of gender typing that suggests that:
A. we process gender types based solely on the influences of our environments.
B. parents (caregivers) are the sole determining force in the gender typing of children gender
C. is "stamped" into the wiring of the brain and how it processes information
D. gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts.
Answer:
D. gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts.
Explanation:
Lawrence Kohlberg was an American psychologist popularly known for his work on theory of stages of moral development. In late 1960s, he suggested a cognitive-developmental view of gender typing that suggests that: children had made a cognitive judgement about their gender identity before they selected same sex models for sex typed behavoirs.
This implies that, for example, girls think “I am a girl, therefore I want to do girl things, hence, the opportunity to do girl things is rewarding”. This view is quite different from the view of the child as behaving in a gender-typed way simply because he or she is rewarded.
Hence, the correct answer is gender typing in children occurs when they form concepts of gender and then fit their behavior to those concepts
The guys in the painting are planning to do something. So more like a compromise I'd say.
Answer: THYROID.
Explanation:From this scenario, we can conclude that Atifa's THYROID is not functioning properly.
The thyroid gland can be defined as a large butterfly shaped gland that secretes hormones directly into the blood or lymph(endocrine gland) located at the front of the neck. They are responsible for all the cells in the b ody to function properly. The thyroid gland regulates the body's metabolic rate as well as heart and digestive function, muscle control, brain development, mood and bone maintenance.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Mississippi river is one i dont know the other srry...
