1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenKa [72]
3 years ago
14

What happened as a result of the Civil Rights movement?

Social Studies
1 answer:
finlep [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Ended segregation, and banned discrimination of sex, color, race, religion, ethnicity.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Professor Srinivasan is a psychologist, yet she does not study cognition, thoughts, or feelings because she claims that they are
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

<em>- behaviorist</em>

Explanation:

Behaviorism is the <em>concept that by observable behavior (actions) human or  animal psychology can be critically analyzed, instead of thoughts and  emotions that can not be witnessed.</em>  

This study arose as a response to psychology of the 19th century,  which used self-examination of one's thoughts and emotions to analyze the  psychology of humans and animals.

3 0
3 years ago
Describe a time when you had to work with a difficult team member. What actions did you take to resolve the situation to encoura
miv72 [106K]

Answer and explanation:

That is a very common question in job interviews. The best thing to do is show flexibility and willingness to leave you ego behind when dealing with difficult interpersonal situations. A possible answer would be:

"I once had a colleague who was giving the group the impression that they weren't as concerned with the results as everyone else. Their attitudes, words, and actions were often counterproductive, leaving the team frustrated. I listened to the team's complaints but, when approaching that specific person, I gave them the chance to explain what was wrong. Instead of accusing them from the get-go, I expressed concern over their well-being and safety. It turned out that their behavior was linked to a personal problem. After discussing it and assuring that person they had our support, their behavior improved considerably."

6 0
3 years ago
When a court finds that the shareholders of a corporation are using the corporate structure to shield themselves from liability
Burka [1]

The correct answer would be, Piercing the Corporate Veil.

The court may disregard the corporate structure and impose personal liability on the shareholders treating them like partners. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.

Explanation:

A corporation is a form of business in which there are officers called as the board of directors, who run the business as a separate legal entity.

There are shareholders in the corporation who have their shares or stakes in the company.

When a court finds that the shareholders of a corporation are using corporate structure as a shield from liability when acting purely for personal purposes, then in this situation, the court holds the shareholders and directors, personally liable for their actions and debts. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.

Learn more about Piercing the Corporate Veil at:

brainly.com/question/13800014

#LearnWithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
Statues can prohibit and declare policies
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

A statute is a formal written enactment of a legislative authority that governs the legal entities of a city, state, or country by way of consent. Typically, statutes command or prohibit something, or declare policy.Statutes are rules made by legislative bodies; they are distinguished from case law or precedent, which is decided by courts, and regulations issued by government agencies.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The Executive and Legislative branches have checks against the Judiciary including all but which of the following A. Presidentia
irinina [24]

Answer:

D. Congress can refuse to fund law clerks and other staf for the SCOTUS

Explanation:

The Executive and Legislative branches have checks against the Judiciary for presidential appointment of justices, congress changing the number of justices on the SCOTUS, congress changing the original jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, congress can change the appellate jurisdiction of the SCOTUS, except refusing to fund law clerks and other staff for the SCOTUS

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it illegal to buy viagra from canada if you have a prescription?
    5·1 answer
  • Most states have programs that help with the education of individuals identified as “gifted.” Please select the best answer from
    11·2 answers
  • Social darwinism emplies that the rich are superior to the poor. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    12·1 answer
  • Economic models, such as the circular-flow model: a. capture the important elements of the problem under study. b. predict pheno
    12·1 answer
  • Identify whether or not the following are cultural norms that must be legally allowed by all fifty states, decreed by the 1967 U
    10·1 answer
  • When characters are unaware that their fate is being guided by other powers, it is called __________.
    5·1 answer
  • Read A Day in the Life of a Pharaoh.
    15·1 answer
  • Use the quotes and your knowledge of U.S. Government and Politics to answer parts A, B, and C.
    12·1 answer
  • Help plsssssssssss<br><br> has to b a long 3 paragraph essay, thanks your a life saver
    12·2 answers
  • Earth Space Science unit 1 test
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!