The Lewis and Clark expedition resonates because it’s not just a white man’s army, but rather a group of people from many different racial, ethnic, cultural and social backgrounds—a human community as diverse as any in America today. Consider York, William Clark’s slave and fellow adventurer, or Pierre Cruzatte, the one-eyed fiddle player, who was part French and part Omaha Indian. There was German-born Pvt. John Potts, a miller by trade and a soldier most likely by necessity. Here is Sacagawea, a Shoshone woman who spent formative years with the Hidatsa Indians, and Jean Baptiste Charbonneau, a child of mixed Shoshone-French ancestry. Imagine the sounds around the campfire: William Clark’s Virginia-Kentucky drawl, Sgt. John Ordway’s New Hampshire inflections, George Drouillard’s Shawnee-flavored French, and the cries and first words of Jean Baptiste, the baby born to Sacagawea on the trip. This is the crazy quilt that was and is America.
Explanation:
Answer:
I would say C. It took away Native Americans' source of economic power.
Explanation:
It's either B or C, but the Europeans took away the culture that the Natives had and the economic stability. The natives had there own roads, irrigation systems, and towns, and the Europeans came in with all new tools and weapons.
The Sistine Chapel Ceiling. Mention Michelangelo and one work that instantly comes to mind is the artist's stunning fresco painted on the ceiling of the Vatican City's Sistine Chapel. ...
David. ...
Bacchus. ...
Madonna of Bruges. ...
The Torment of Saint Anthony. ...
Doni Tondo. ...
Moses. ...
The Last Judgment, Sistine Chapel.
It is false that primary sources are the only sources that historians use, since it is important to consult the works of other writers and historians to get an idea of how events in history have played out. Historians usually use a combination of secondary and primary sources.
The U.S. government attempted to convince people to conserve resources during World War 1.
I hope this helps.
