Answer:
From the given information, we can infer that Lorenzo has decided to give Maya a warning.
Explanation:
The warning is the statement which indicates any unpleasant situation which may arise if not taken any precaution. Although it is unpleasant to hear and to contemplate, it gives sufficient time for any situation to be covered up within the time. In the above case, Lorenzo decided to warn Maya about her activity. By doing this he would be able to draw Maya's attention towards her behavior.
Answer:
a. both the cost of the goods sold and the cost of ending inventory.
Explanation:
The physical count is used in the periodic inventory system to calculate the amount of ending inventory. However the cost of goods sold can be derived from using the ending inventory count. Suppose we have ending inventory of 100 units and Purchases were 500 units Also there were no beginning inventory units so the Cost of goods Sold can be calculated as
Cost of Goods Sold= Beginning Inventory Add Purchases Less Ending Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold= 0 + 500- 100= 400
<span>Both of these examples are illustrative of the "behavior" element of the assertive message format. These example are objective in that they only outlined what happened in a given situation. Although the second may appear to have an emotional connotation, it simply gives an objective impression of what happened.</span>
Answer:
$29,390
Explanation:
For computing the total cost first we have to determine the variable cost per customer and the fixed cost which is shown below:
Variable cost Per Customer is
= (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (high number of customer served - low cost of customer served)
= ($28,934 - $28,241) ÷ (14,100 - 11,214)
= $0.24
Now
Fixed cost is
= High cost - (high number of customer served × variable cost per customer)
= 28,934 - (14,100 × 0.24)
= $25,550
So, the total cost for 16,000 customers is
= Fixed cost + variable cost
= $25,550 + (16,000 × $0.24)
= $29,390
Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
