Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Our well-being can be influenced by constructive and destructive relations. Constructive relationships can continue to strengthen our character and how we communicate with others. In the other hand, our self-esteem or our relations with other people can be destroyed by destructive relations. Depending on the kinds of relations we have, such relationships will affect your well-being positively or negatively.
Explanation:
Constructive relations are relations in which roles are flexible, there is "mutual respect" for relations & "open communication". These are a few elements of a strong communication. This results in a happier and healthy well-being. There is a positive effect on the persons involved in the relationship and such relationship make the lives of people healthier and peaceful. Also, a constructive relation portrays strong "mutual understanding" between two people.
On the other hand, destructive or toxic relation are distinguished by selfish intentions and lack of respect for others wellbeing. These relations must be stopped. This contributes to a very "poor health" which may lead to problems with "mental health". In such relationships there is no "mutual understanding", which creates a big difference in the relationship between people leading to tension, anxiety and depression. It is usually impossible to get out while you are in a destructive relationship but it may be achieved with proper support.
<span>It helped them deal with the “incestuous” overtones in their relationship. Larry had never known his own mother.</span>
Researchers believe that taijin kyofusho has been shaped by: cultural factors.
<h3>What are cultural factors?</h3>
These are the factors that are used to encompass the beliefs and the values of a given set of people.
The cultural beliefs of a group of people has to do with their way of life and what has shaped them as a people.
Read more on culture here: brainly.com/question/25010777
#SPJ12
