This can either be Louis Thurstone's Primary Mental Abilities or Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligence. Both can support this premise because it illustrates that intelligence is not general unlike the theory proposed by Charles Spearman. In Thurstone's and Gardner's theories, a person can e intelligent in one aspect and not on another. This is because there are multiple areas of intelligence and it is not rarely possible for a person to excel in every area.
According to my knowledge this is the answer:
Rule of law is one of the most important pillar of Constitution.
Rule of Law is something which opposes common man's rule and supports Government's rule. This is actually necessary for maintaining peace and stability in democratic countries like India.
Certified checks are guaranteed by the bank itself, not just by your signature; this is TRUE.
Answer:
Different people define culture in different ways, for example “Culture: learned and shared human patterns or models for living; day- to-day living patterns, these patterns and models pervade all aspects of human social interaction. Culture is mankind’s primary adaptive mechanism”1. Another author says that “Culture is the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one category of people from another.”2. from these definitions it is clear that both explains the same idea but in different words, says that culture is first learned after learning it is then shared so it’s a common fact that the younger first learn the culture from their elders and when these young become elders they transfer it to the next generation. But the culture learned it includes all the aspects of human interaction and thus it become the mankind’s adoptive mechanism.
<em><u>hope it helps ☺️✌️</u></em>
Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government.
Locke quarreled for the belief that the individuals are conclusively the reference of powers in supervising, Thus the individual also has the freedom to dismount a party that is not suitably accepting the nation's people. John Locke was discussing the concept of a "social contract." According to his opinion, a government's capability to administer by the permission of the people. This was a transition from the unfounded beliefs of "divine right monarchy" that a king governed because Lord designated him to be the leader. Locke discarded the acceptance of the spiritual right government in his First Treatise on Civil Government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke contended for the benefits of the people to organize their ministries according to their wishes and to protect their personal life, education, and resources.
