I believe it's Linda knows she is a good reader, so she takes an advanced literature class as an elective.
From the 1340s to the nineteenth century, barring two brief interims during the 1360s and the 1420s, the lords and rulers of England (and, later, of Great Britain) likewise guaranteed the position of the royalty of France. The case dates from Edward III, who guaranteed the French position of royalty in 1340 as the sororal nephew of the last immediate Capetian, Charles IV. Edward and his beneficiaries battled the Hundred Years' War to implement this case and were quickly fruitful during the 1420s under Henry V and Henry VI, yet the House of Valois, a cadet part of the Capetian tradition, was, at last, successful and held control of France. Regardless of this, English and British rulers proceeded to unmistakably call themselves rulers of France and the French fleur-de-lys were incorporated into the regal arms. This proceeded until 1801, by which time France never again had any ruler, having turned into a republic. The Jacobite petitioners, in any case, did not unequivocally surrender the case.
This is a little open for interpretation, but I would generally say that the best answer is that Josip Broz Tito was a very powerful leader, who kept the republics and the different groups together.
For example, we can see this from the fact that the first conflict happened in 1981: one year after his death ( a protest of Kosovans who demanded autonomy).
The reason why people, specifically Puritans, left England to go to America in the 1600s was because of religious persecution of their belief, their belief being the simplified version of the religion hosted by the Reformation of the Church of England under Elizabeth.
