3 years ago

Which party criticized union widows' pensions as a classic example of the perils of excessive government?

1 answer:

3 0

The Democrats criticized union widows’ pensions.

When the campaign for the widow spread out, private agencies regarded it as criticism for their service procedures but also a danger to their funding. The drive against the hollowing out of pension of the widows brought about the government’s resolve to get back the cuts that the widowed mothers would have to endure.

You might be interested in

How does this excerpt connect to the theme "evil can never truly hide itself"?dr. jekyll becomes mr. hyde and cannot transform b

choli [55]

Hello, I believe your answer is A

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Emma wants to go swimming the first day the pool opens in may

wolverine [178]

Is there a question or no

7 0

3 years ago

You have six friends over to your apartment for dinner and drinks. Three of the friends are discussing Einstein’s theory of rela

vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:Yes, because the conversation is not unifocal

Explanation:

Unifocal means focus on one person or one subject because for a part to happen more than one person discuss different issues amongst different small groups.

And within this sis friends we find the two groups of three in which they discuss different topics of interest.

It is not one direction to one person but it is more interactive amongst the groups.

4 0

3 years ago

_____ holds that the supreme court should overturn the elected branches of government reluctantly and as a last resort.

lisabon 2012 [21]

The answer is <span>judicial restraint.
</span><span>judicial restraint is a way for the Government to limit the power held by members of the judiciery branch.
Because of this restraint, A judge need to be 100% sure that a certain law is unconstitutional before striking it.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

The owner of a stationary bicycle wrote a letter to her friend offering to sell her stationary bicycle to him for $150. The frie

olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

No, because the mailbox rule does not apply—whichever is received first controls

Explanation:

No, because the mailbox rule does not apply—whichever is received first controls;the parties do not have a contract, because the mailbox rule does not apply when the offeree sends a rejection, followed by an acceptance. the mailbox rule does not apply here, and the matter is decided based on which letter was received first, there is no contract

8 0

3 years ago