Answer:
D- People can decrease their carbon footprint by reducing the amount of energy they use.
Explanation:
I just took the test.
Answer:
A. Children who are different from others are more likely to be bullied.
Explanation:
A child who is different from others, stands out among his peers and is likely to be bullied. For example, children who are different from their peer physically such as dwarfs, obese, deformed are more likely to be bullied. Children who are also different in their mental capacity compared to their peers are also likely to be bullied, e.g. mentally impaired children.
On the contrary, children who blend in easily with their peers are not easily spotted out or bullied.
Answer:
Living in the United States, we're accustomed to hearing about regions. For instance, when I say I live in the Northeast, fellow Americans can probably surmise I reside in a place with snowy winters. They might not be able to guess my exact state, but if given a chance between Pennsylvania and Florida, I'm guessing they'll choose the right answer.
Like us, other continents also use regions to classify areas. Today, we're going to discuss one such region as we dive into the history, culture, and politics of the Andes and Pampas, a region way to our south that encompasses much of western and southern South America.
Despite the fact that the Andes and Pampas go together like peanut butter and jelly in most discussions of South America, there are some real differences between the two. First of all, they have striking differences in geography. For instance, the Andes Mountains are a huge mountain chain. Covering much of the West Coast of the continent, it encompasses Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, and even part of Argentina.
Very opposite from the rugged Andes are the Pampas. Keeping things simple, the Pampas are the grasslands of South America. These famous grasslands cover parts of Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Answer:
invalid
Explanation:
Manuel is not a public defender and Bill is not the president so Ann wish is invalid.
In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
