In early Native American history, culture and history was passed across generations with <u>Totem poles.</u>
<h3>What was the purpose of a totem pole?</h3>
Totem poles in Native Indian culture was used to communicate the cultures, history, and rules of a society to the next generation, and to the current generation.
It contained drawings which were carved into it to communicate messages. The pole would be set up in a central location so all could see.
Find out more on Totem poles at brainly.com/question/13617293.
#SPJ1
He was right because he was protecting his land and people living on the land. He knew that he was a threat for his land's future. Metis have send many notes and list of rules they need but still the Canadian government was coming and being rude with metis
He was wrong to execute Thomas scott. Luis riel should have thrown Thomas Scott into a jail and ask him why he is so rude and why they dont listen to their suggestions. The Canadian government are the ones who sent Thomas Scott to Red river and claim it to Canadian's. If the Canadian government would listen to Metis, Thomas Scott wouldn't had been excecuted.
Hope this helped. >.< ( > _ < )
Answer:
the mere-exposure effect
Explanation:
Mere exposure effect: In psychology, the term "mere exposure effect" was first proposed by a social psychologist named Robert Zajonc during 1968 and is also referred to as the "familiarity principle". The mere exposure effect is determined as a phenomenon in which if an individual gets exposed towards a specific thing, then he or she is more likely to develop a preference for that particular thing over time.
In the question above, the given statement signifies that Zoe liking jazz is most likely due to the mere-exposure effect.
Answer:
The both are beside each other so it would be a good idea to help each other they both trade and have some type of country relationship so it would make sense for them to help each other.
Explanation:
In the presently stated speech, Laura would be arguing from the point of causation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When arguing from the point of causation, the speaker or presenter would base her arguments and claims concerning evidence which proves that certain events almost always bring about the same results, or likewise, certain events would always almost eradicate the effects of the events.
Hence here, Laura is speaking from the point of causation.
