1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
3 years ago
14

One factor that determines the effectiveness of a lobbyist is?

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
ludmilkaskok [199]3 years ago
4 0
How accurate the information is.
You might be interested in
What history lessons did Hitler forget in 1941? Explain.
kotegsom [21]

Explanation:

I'm not sure there is any direct evidence that it was strategically a bad idea. Strategically it made sense to attack the Soviet Union while they were weak and unprepared for war. Hitler knew that as he made progress on the Western front that Stalin grew more and more nervous every day about the growing power of Nazi Germany.

What must be remembered is that Hitler almost won the war with the Soviet Union. Hitler felt the army was not moving fast enough towards Moscow. If Hitler's commanders had done what Hitler had wanted, which was rush as fast to Moscow as possible, then it is possible the Soviet Union would have fallen without time to prepare a massive infantry army. Germany's army was also not prepared for fighting in cold weather. It was not expected that the Soviet Union was even close to capable of fighting back. The Soviet Union's army was in shambles throughout the entire war. It was ill-equipped and all it had to offer was quantity over quality.

The combination of the cold, unexpected resistance and the amount of time it was taking to get to Moscow because of cold weather and resistance was setting back Germany. The whole strategy was to get in and occupy Moscow and take the leadership. It took about six months for the Germans to get nearly to the gates of Moscow, when the tide finally started to turn at Stalingrad. Hitler most importantly underestimated the sheer will of the the country to defend itself no matter how much the cost in blood. The Soviet Union lost a whopping 13.5% of its population to the war.

So in short, strategically a lot of it made sense at the time. The operation was blundered because the blitzkrieg was not fast enough, the underestimation of the kind of force the Soviet Union could pull together and an underestimation of the cold winter. The plan was also delayed because of setbacks in the Balkans and helping the Italians out where they had failed.

It's hard to find actual strategic proof of what was going on through Hitler's mind and his advisors to take on this risky operation. We do know however that these had been a part of Hitler's plans for years. In my opinion, it was probably thought at the time the odds were in Nazi Germany's favor. In all reality, the Germans had a pretty good chance of winning the war within six months, perhaps if just a few variables had changed they might have actually pulled it off. If they could have gotten there a month earlier, they probably would have won.

Also Great Britain was absolutely in no position to put up any kind of resistance except for the occasional bombing run, which was producing much larger losses than they could keep up with equipment wise.

Also Stalin and Hitler were not real allies, they only had a non-aggression pact, and both were not exactly known to be trustworthy. Stalin was also at many times gullible and Hitler took advantage of this diplomatically. Even when warned that Germany was going to invade, Stalin dismissed his advisers.

Taking in all these factors, the thought probably never occurred to Hitler and his officers that the Soviet Union would ever be able to launch any kind of counter attack. It took quite some time and the United States to intervene for the Soviet Union to really begin its successful counter-offensive.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Links will be reported
Travka [436]

Answer:

No offense but some guys sound desperate some sound charming for the girls some sound really angelic whereas some sound annoying I don't know how else to describe Americans I don't mean anything in a bad way

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
magbigay ng larawan/simbolismo ng bagay na maaari mong ihalintulad sa ating mudo dahil sa katangi-tangi nitong ganda at ipaliwan
Sladkaya [172]

Answer:taco

Explanation:

Taco

6 0
3 years ago
True or False: Endemic species are particularly vulnerable to extinction.
rodikova [14]

Answer:

i believe the answer is true

Explanation:

plz mark brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Identify and explain ONE cultural OR social effect of the development on industrial capitalism in the period from 1750 to 1900.
Stells [14]
The Development of the Middle Class and Working Class.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What according to mazzini are the sources of national belonging
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following should employers do actively to prevent workplace hazards
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think that Lincoln measures to deal with disloyalty and dissent represented an abuse of power?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the connection between a credit report and a credit score?
    12·2 answers
  • When playing the card game Blackjack, multiple decks are used and reshuffled often so that the outcomes of the cards dealt are a
    9·1 answer
  • One of the best choices you can make for yourself is learning to make hard decisions about money.
    11·2 answers
  • bakit mahalaga na linangin ang mga inaasahang kakayahan at kilos sa panahon ng pagdadalaga at pagbibinata?
    14·1 answer
  • Gawain sa Pagkatuto Bilang 1:
    14·1 answer
  • Create a post that places each of the two political parties (Federalist and Anti-Federalist) on the political spectrum.
    15·1 answer
  • How does the anchoring bias link to working memory, perception, selective retrieval, misinformation effect and the serial-positi
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!