Answer:
Explanation:
Year-end plan assets were $4,250,000
At the beginning of the year, plan assets were $3,974,000
So Actual Return on Plan Assets = (4,250,000 - 3,974,000) - (420,000 - 365,000)
Actual Return on Plan Assets = 276,000 - (55,000)
Actual Return on Plan Assets = 221,000
Answer: d)Firms have to pay more to attract inputs, as these inputs have to share the risk.
Explanation: When the market system tries to put restriction on the business risk to owner and other investors , the firms have to give more payment to attract them to market business.
The chances of risk have have to be shared by both the parties so the owners or investors are going to indulge in the business when they gain some benefit e.g.-more payment.
Other options are incorrect because entrepreneurship will not be encouraged through this process. Incomes will not be distributed equally and neither the prudent risk management will be aimed.Thus, the correct option is option(d).
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
B.) 2-3% growth per period I think
