Answer:
The "grave danger" that the author is talking about is the danger of atomic weaponry
Explanation:
"Preliminary Statement of the Association of Manhattan District Scientists" was a 100-page report written after the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The "grave danger" that the scientist is talking about in the article is the dangers of atomic weaponry. The article talks about the consequences that wrong decisions of leaders may have on its nations.
Answer:
The Frankfurt National Assembly was at long last ready to embrace a proposed constitution for Germany on March 28, 1849. This report accommodated general document, parliamentary government, and an inherited head. Germany was to have a unified monetary and customs system yet would keep up the inward self-rule of the constituent German states.
Explanation:
A parliamentary parliament met in Frankfurt in March 1848 at the prompting of liberal pioneers from all the German states (Austria also included), and it required the election of a National assembly. The races were appropriately held, however the discretionary laws and techniques differed impressively from state to state, and on May 18 the National assembly met in the Church of St. Paul (Paulskirche) in Frankfurt. Moderate non-conformists held a lion's share in the assembly, however the whole political range was spoken to among its delegates. The liberal Heinrich von Gagern was chosen leader of the parliament.
Answer:
:
Historians such as Edmund Morgan say this evidence suggests that racial attitudes were much more flexible in early 17th-century Virginia than they would later become. A 1625 census recorded 23 Africans in Virginia. In 1649 there were 300, and in 1690 there were 950.
Answer:
a) during the first call she sat with every limb composed, every fold correctly draped, calm as a summer sea, cool as a snowbank, and as silent as the sphinx
Explanation:
Hello. You forgot to add the text to which this question refers. The text is:
Pennsylvania created the most radical state constitution of the period. Following the idea of popular rule to its logical conclusion, Pennsylvania created a state government with several distinctive features. First, the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776 abolished property requirements for voting as well as for holding office. If you were an adult man who paid taxes, then you were allowed to vote or even to run for office. This was a dramatic expansion of who was considered a political person, but other aspects of the new state government were even more radical. Pennsylvania also became a "unicameral" government where the legislature only had one body. Furthermore, the office of the governor was entirely eliminated. Radicals in Pennsylvania observed that the governor was really just like a small-scale king and that an upper legislative body (like the House of Lords in Parliament) was supposed to represent wealthy men and aristocrats. Rather than continue those forms of government, the Pennsylvania constitution decided that "the people" could rule most effectively through a single body with complete legislative power.
Answer:
The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
Explanation:
The text above shows how Pennsylvania created a constitution a totally different and radical constitution compared to other American states. This is because Pennsylvania, through its constitution, modified its entire political body, creating a more popular structure and accessible to all citizens. The main changes occurred in terms of who could vote and stand and how the state's legislative body would be established. In summary, these changes are:
- The Pennsylvania Constitution established a unicameral legislative body.
- The Pennsylvania Constitution abolished property requirements for voting and holding elected office.
