Answer:
no bc they r swapped and 40 is higher
Step-by-step explanation:
k
Answer:
Option C is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>

</h2><h3>

</h3><h3>

</h3><h3>

</h3><h3>

</h3><h3>

</h3><h3>Hope it is helpful....</h3>
Answer:
The answer to your question is y - 0 = 40(x - 15)
Step-by-step explanation:
y = 40x + 600
Convert to y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)
Process
1.- Factor 40 in the right side of the equation
y = 40(x - 15)
2.- Give the form of the point slope form
y - 0 = 40(x - 15)
where
y₁ = 0
m = 40
x₁ = 15
Answer:
9 months
Step-by-step explanation:
3*12-27
36-27
9
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is
