Answer:
acountability, kill bureaucracy before it starts - more functions, fewer departments, more “teams,” fewer committees, open lines of communication, the customer is everybody’s responsibility, never stop “re-inventing” the business.
Explanation:
Answer:
B) coercive power.
Explanation:
There are two ways of influencing others to follow the instruction or to get the process in the right order.Those two ways are: Reward power and coercive power.
Coercive power: It is the ability of the authority to use power or force against people or subordinates to follow the instruction or to get them disciplined. It is an act of punishment for committing errors so that it does not get repeated.
In the given case, the manufacturer decided to punish resellers for their action. As Manufacturing decided to slow down deliveries and postpone product availability to these resellers.
Answer:
Net pay $764.5
Explanation:
given data
wages = $1000
income taxes = $159
solution
particular net pay
Gross wages $1000
less
Income taxes withheld $159
FICA-social security (1000×6.2%) = $62
FICA-Medicare taxes (1000×1.45%) = $14.5
Total taxes withheld (235.5)
So, Net Pay $764.5
Answer:
C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Purchasing Cost of Stock ABC purchased = $40 per share
Purchasing Cost of Stock DEF purchased = $35 per share
Time = 6 months
Selling price of share of ABC = $42 per share
Selling price of DEF share = $36
Dividend paid to the DEF = $0.5 each quarter i.e $0.5 twice in 6 months
Thus,
Total dividend paid to DEF = $0.5 × 2
= $1
Now,
For ABC
Total return = Selling price - Purchasing Cost
= $42 - $40
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $40 ] × 100%
= 5%
For DEF
Total return = Selling price + Dividend received - Purchasing Cost
= $36 + $1 - $35
= $2 per share
thus,
Holding period return = [ Total return ÷ Purchasing cost ] × 100%
= [ $2 ÷ $35 ] × 100%
= 5.7%
Hence,
option C) ABC 5% and DEF 5.7%.
Answer:
a. Shopping for used cars when the seller has private information about the car unavailable to the buyer
Explanation:
When the market is not able to produce an efficient quantity, then it is said that market is failed. This might happens due to many reasons and asymmetric information is one of them. When there is an asymmetric information, then the sellers of the used car have information about it, but the buyer do not have the full information about the used car.
Hence this leads to inefficient outcome and therefore market fails.
Hence it can be said that a market failure example is Shopping for used cars when the seller has private information about the car unavailable to the buyer.
Hence option first is the correct answer.