The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake. If some people would choose not to plug into the experience machine, does this show that hedonism is false?
No, what it means is that under the belief system and consideration of that individual, hedonism is not the way to receive pleasure and there would other activities or satisfactions that would report pleasure in doing them. Diversity in people's character and beliefs makes life more rich and interesting in that the search for pleasure has different ways, according to the satisfactoriness, values, and goals of each individual.
Although Hedonists such as Epicurus and Mill have claimed that pleasure is the only thing worth pursuing its own sake, other thinkers and philosophers considered that pleasure is the final result of getting accomplished that what made us thrive under different -and sometimes- difficult circumstances.
So pleasure, fr the sake of the pleasure it is not the only way to approach this.
Answer:
The National Response Framework explains how, at all levels, the nation effectively manages all-hazards response. -Thats a false statement
Hope this helps
<h2>Give ME brainiest please!</h2>
Yes for an example you can be a free worker but also be treated like an slave.
Answer:
Lincoln's election thus served as the main catalyst of the American Civil War. The United States had become increasingly sectionally divided during the 1850s, primarily over extending slavery into the Western territories
Explanation:
A political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. It can also mean: <span>a way of organizing a society in which the government owns the things that are used to make and transport. </span><span>
Source: Google Search </span>
