Complete Question:
The project represented by this resource load chart (see attached) has a maximum limit of 6 units of resource activity in any day. The first activities that are strong candidates for shifting are:
A) Activity A
B) Activities B and C
C) Activities D and E
D) Activity E and F
Answer:
The first activities that are strong candidates for shifting are:
C) Activities D and E
Explanation:
Activities D and E have a total time of 5 days altogether based on the attached resource load chart. They have the least time and can be shifted to accommodate other activities before they can be tackled sequentially.
A resource load chart displays the total amount of resources required as a function of time in any given project. It is the best method for establishing the existence of some resource conflicts across project activities, especially when compared to Gantt Charts, Network Diagrams, and Pareto Diagrams.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Work in process refers to those goods which require further processing. When a department transfers work in process(WIP) to another department, the recipient department's stock of WIP is debited i.e debit the receiver principle.
Similarly work in process that is being transferred out of a department would be recorded like Purchase return i.e credit what goes out.
A debit in WIP account increases it's balance whereas a credit in WIP account reduces it's balance.
Answer:
Menu engineering
Explanation:
The interdisciplinary study of profitability and popularity of the strategic layout of menu items is referred to as menu engineering. It also deals with menu pricing, design, and content. A grid is also used to evaluate decisions regarding current and future menu content. It is also a management application.
Answer:
The correct answer is: No, this situation is impossible.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the reality the situation with the demand curve is all the opposite. The <em>law of demand</em> establishes that there is an indirect relationship between the price of a product and its quantity demanded in the market, therefore that when the price of a good increases then its quantity demanded decreases. And it is by logic as well, because no one will buy more of something if the products is more expensive than it was before. Therefore that the situation in the text is impossible and it could only be opposite.
