1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin [286]
3 years ago
8

When one changes the significance level of a hypothesis test from 0.01 to 0.05, which of the following will happen? Check all th

at apply. A. It becomes easier to prove that the null hypothesis is true. B. The chance of committing a Type I error changes from 0.01 to 0.05. C. It becomes harder to prove that the null hypothesis is true. D. The test becomes more stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e. it becomes harder to reject the null hypothesis). E. The test becomes less stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., it becomes easier to reject the null hypothesis). F. The chance of committing a Type II error changes from 0.01 to 0.05. G. The chance that the null hypothesis is true changes from 0.01 to 0.05.
Social Studies
1 answer:
jekas [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B) The chance of committing a Type I error changes from 0.01 to 0.05., E) The test becomes less stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., it becomes easier to reject the null hypothesis), therefore. C) It becomes harder to prove that the null hypothesis is true and G) The chance that the null hypothesis is true changes from 0.01 to 0.05 are all correct answers

Explanation:

The alfa error or type I, refers to the probability error of rejecting the null hypothesis, when it is true, it is the chance of mistake when affirming that an association exists between two variables tested as a cause of an effect on something. i.e: H1: fast food is responsible for diabetes (this is working hypothesis), H0: red hair is responsible for diabetes (this is the null hypothesis). The beta error or type II is related to the size of the sample, it is the chance of accepting something (the null hypothesis) when it is false, depends mostly on having enough measures (or persons under study) so your hypothesis can be proven and be a real representation of the population under study. The statistical significance, namely the p value, can be narrow (p=0.01) or wide (p=0.05), it can be easily understand if we explain it in terms of percentage: you can have 99% (p=0.01) of certainty to affirm that the null hypothesis (the one that you do not believe is true, in the example, red hair as cause of diabetes) is actually wrong or 95% (p=0.05) of certainty to affirm that the null hypothesis (again, the one that you do not believe is true) is actually wrong.

You might be interested in
Children play a big role in many household purchases.​ ________ occurs when a mother or father​ (the decision​ maker) "surrender
ohaa [14]
Peer Pressure!!! Nah I’m kidding but really I don’t know. The app is forcing me to answer my first question
5 0
3 years ago
Why was Jackson turner able to declare the American frontier closed in 1890
andrew-mc [135]

It was meant to warn Americans against potential peril in the wake of the 1890 census which coldly stated that there was no longer unexplored wilderness in America (sans Alaska), that there was no longer a contiguous frontier, there was also not an official statement saying that the frontier had been closed because it was merely hearsay.

5 0
3 years ago
Ari yayinlari giris anahtar​
lys-0071 [83]
This is a place where people ask for their needs. I don’t think it’s cool to do these types of things
6 0
3 years ago
Ralph is writing a report about popular music in America's history. He will collect information about music in the United States
never [62]
B, because this is answer has nothing to do with American music.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who are the founding Fathers of sociology and their contributions?
Softa [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Marx, Spencer, and Comte all acknowledged the importance of using science to study society, although none actually used scientific methods. Not until Emile Durkheim (1858–1917) did a person systematically apply scientific methods to sociology as a discipline.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the reasons for the founding of the Maryland Colony?
    15·1 answer
  • Both of Tim's parents have brown eyes, but Tim has blue eyes. How is this possible?
    7·1 answer
  • A recent scientific study of the land surrounding a large city has found a 40 percent decrease in forest area and 60 percent dec
    5·2 answers
  • What does we the people mean
    7·2 answers
  • Professor Marcos believes that evolution has created many remarkable capabilities that are present even in early infancy, partic
    6·1 answer
  • What was the<br> Fugitive(someone running<br> away) Slave Law?
    14·1 answer
  • Jack, a student, has applied for a job in one of the top private banks in the U.S. Jack feels securing a job with a private bank
    9·1 answer
  • Why do you think the style of each mosque is so different? (Consider the time, situation etc.)
    8·1 answer
  • Today in our country, what is the ration of people who can identify that a relative came to this country through Ellis Island to
    6·1 answer
  • How long does it take for a belly button piercing to heal before swimming.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!