1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin [286]
3 years ago
8

When one changes the significance level of a hypothesis test from 0.01 to 0.05, which of the following will happen? Check all th

at apply. A. It becomes easier to prove that the null hypothesis is true. B. The chance of committing a Type I error changes from 0.01 to 0.05. C. It becomes harder to prove that the null hypothesis is true. D. The test becomes more stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e. it becomes harder to reject the null hypothesis). E. The test becomes less stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., it becomes easier to reject the null hypothesis). F. The chance of committing a Type II error changes from 0.01 to 0.05. G. The chance that the null hypothesis is true changes from 0.01 to 0.05.
Social Studies
1 answer:
jekas [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B) The chance of committing a Type I error changes from 0.01 to 0.05., E) The test becomes less stringent to reject the null hypothesis (i.e., it becomes easier to reject the null hypothesis), therefore. C) It becomes harder to prove that the null hypothesis is true and G) The chance that the null hypothesis is true changes from 0.01 to 0.05 are all correct answers

Explanation:

The alfa error or type I, refers to the probability error of rejecting the null hypothesis, when it is true, it is the chance of mistake when affirming that an association exists between two variables tested as a cause of an effect on something. i.e: H1: fast food is responsible for diabetes (this is working hypothesis), H0: red hair is responsible for diabetes (this is the null hypothesis). The beta error or type II is related to the size of the sample, it is the chance of accepting something (the null hypothesis) when it is false, depends mostly on having enough measures (or persons under study) so your hypothesis can be proven and be a real representation of the population under study. The statistical significance, namely the p value, can be narrow (p=0.01) or wide (p=0.05), it can be easily understand if we explain it in terms of percentage: you can have 99% (p=0.01) of certainty to affirm that the null hypothesis (the one that you do not believe is true, in the example, red hair as cause of diabetes) is actually wrong or 95% (p=0.05) of certainty to affirm that the null hypothesis (again, the one that you do not believe is true) is actually wrong.

You might be interested in
Madeline is seven months old. her mother is eating a cookie and madeline wants some. her mother hides the cookie under a napkin,
nirvana33 [79]
The scenario above exemplifies object permanence. It is likely that Madeline has exhibit this as she believes the cookie is still there even if she does not know where it is. An object permanence explains that a person would believe that a certain thing or object exist without having the assurance of its existence. It could be seen above as Madeline thinks that the cookie is still there even if it is hidden and not seen from her sight.
8 0
3 years ago
The use of knowledge or science for a practical purpose is _______.
sineoko [7]

The answer is Technology.

6 0
3 years ago
With a seemingly obvious ending, why should a reader continue reading the story? A to witness Farquhar’s death
Airida [17]

Answer: C.

Explanation: An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge is a short story from the time of the civil war written by Ambrose Bierce in 1886.

The first part of the story begins with the description of a man being suspended on Owl Creek Bridge by two soldiers. In the moments before man's death time seems distorted and slows down. The man thinks how he could loosen the knot.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An important research study demonstrated the evil that good people can be readily induced into doing to other good people within
Pachacha [2.7K]

the Stanford Prison Experiment

Explanation:

The Stanford prison experiment was a social psychology experiment whose focus was to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three functions of price in market economy
damaskus [11]
In fact, this function of prices may be analyzed into three separate functions. First, prices determine what goods are to be produced and in what quantities; second, they determine how the goods are to be produced; and third, they determine who will get the goods.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The demonstration in your text that asks you to visualize scenes such as an office, a department store clothing section, a lion,
    6·1 answer
  • The Emotional Intelligence (EI) Attributes definition encompasses two dimensions of objects and capabilities and the interaction
    13·1 answer
  • Maria first rewards herself if she smokes no more than 10 cigarettes a day. The reward is then made contingent upon no more than
    14·1 answer
  • Select one teaching of Jesus from the following choices: Matthew 5:21-24; Matthew 5:43-48; Matthew 6:19-24; Matthew 7:15-23; Luk
    11·1 answer
  • How do you know that owls and hawks eat mice and Spuirrel but not chicken <br>​
    14·1 answer
  • How did the arrival of Friedrich von Steuben affect the Continental Army?
    8·2 answers
  • What are two possible consequences of poor security on tourism​
    10·1 answer
  • Plz help me don't scam and get 15 points ​
    6·1 answer
  • What three tribal folktale stories were common among the mississippi indian
    7·1 answer
  • In a study comparing whether intelligence scores were higher for individuals who listened to music versus those who did not list
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!