Sir lynden oscar pindling
The answer is A. Article I. This article talks about law making and the Legislative branch
<span>The Native Americans didn't believe in personal land ownership. They believed that people could live off of the land.</span>
Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
I do not see diagram one. So the best suitable answer is B. The diagram have little relationship to each other, as some of the land areas shown on the diagrams are in different positions.
