1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Margaret [11]
3 years ago
7

How did John Hay, the US Secretary of State who proposed the Open Door policy, respond to the fact that no countries formally ag

reed to the Open Door policy? A) He backed down and retracted the United States’ request for an Open Door policy. B) He declared that the countries’ lack of response meant that they agreed to the policy. C) He asked China to halt all trade in the Chinese Empire until an agreement was reached. D) He amending the rules of the Open Door Policy multiple times until all countries were satisfied.
History
1 answer:
Daniel [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. John Hay declared tht the countries' lack of response meant that they agreed to the policy.

Explanation:

The Open Door policy was the American political doctrine held in China from 1899 to 1949, the beginning and basis of which were laid by the diplomatic statements of Secretary of State J. Hay. The essence of this policy was that China should pursue free trade and the free flow of capital.  

After the failed Boxer Rebellion, it was decided to divide China into spheres of influence between Britain, France, Germany, Russia and Japan. The United States was not among the powers that received power in China. This was the main reason for this doctrine.

The main point of the doctrine was to provide equal opportunities for European powers and the United States in trade policy in China. The United States suggested that the great powers in their spheres of influence or in the “rented” territory not to impede the interests of other powers and apply the Chinese contractual customs tariff on all goods, regardless of where they were made. It was also proposed to levy the same shipping charges. These measures provided favorable conditions for the penetration of American monopolies into the Chinese market, and the favorable treatment regime in the trade of European capital was minimized. In general, the Americans tried to appear to be benefactors, since the European powers brought a lot of misfortune and ruining to China through the Opium Wars, while the United Statesdid not participate in them, but wanted to get economic benefits in China too.

You might be interested in
Write 2 short paragraphs arguing why the US shouldnt have dropped the bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki, include a thesis statement
Setler79 [48]

Answer:List of the Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan

Most of the people killed in these two bombs were innocents.

American POWs were killed by the atomic bombs in Japan.

The U.S. killed Allied troops during the bombing runs as well.

There were more atomic bombs planned for Japan too.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which emperor of Mali transformed Timbuktu from a dusty desert village into a dazzling center of trade, culture, and learning kn
Goryan [66]
Mansa Musa was the emperor of Mali who transformed Timbuktu from a dusty desert village into a dazzling center of trade, culture and learning known as the "Pearl of Africa". The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope the answer helps you.
3 0
3 years ago
Between 1870 and 1900, a number of new nations were created from __________. A. Austria-Hungary/ B. the Russian Empire / C. Grea
maxonik [38]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. the Russian Empire" Between 1870 and 1900, a number of new nations were created from <span>B. the Russian Empire</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describes the effect factories had on rivers during the Industrial Revolution? Factories created soot that fell into the r
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

Factories caused major environmental problems by dumping waste into the river

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the sit-down stoke DIFFER from a traditional strike in which workers walked off of their jobs ?
svetlana [45]

A sit down strike is a strike which has a somewhat nontraditional nature as it is when employees take "illegal" possession of their workplace by committing to a strike at their work stations. Furthermore, employees 'sit-down' at their station but do not work. It is considered a form of civil disobedience. This differs from a traditional strike as in traditional strikes workers walk off their jobs and therefore can be replaced whereas a sit-down strike causes work stations to be occupied and therefore does not allow employees to be replaced easily.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One reason people tolerated poverty during the Gilded Age was because they
    12·2 answers
  • A major accomplishment of Britain’s Reform Act of 1832 was that it gave voting rights to
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Samaveda?
    9·2 answers
  • The French and Indian War was a war between ______________________________. a. the French and the Native Americans b. the Native
    8·2 answers
  • When did the construction of the panama canal begin?
    13·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo representan los distintos poderes del Estado los intereses de la ciudadanía en la búsqueda del bien común, de la justicia
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the united nation not do more to prevent the conflict in bosnia?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me with this homework
    7·1 answer
  • How does the government of republic typically shape its economy?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did britain and france use colonial solidiers in world war 1
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!