1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darya [45]
3 years ago
13

Which best describes a force?

Mathematics
1 answer:
mariarad [96]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A vector with magnitude and direction

You might be interested in
Solve the following inequality. 5x-3 > 7
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

x > 2

Step-by-step explanation:

5x-3>7

+3 to both sides

5x>10

divide 5 to both sides

x>2

8 0
3 years ago
(X+h)^3 + (x+h)-(x^3+x)
ICE Princess25 [194]
\dfrac{(x+h)^3 + (x+h)-(x^3+x)}{h}=\\
\dfrac{x^3+3x^2h+3xh^2+h^3+x+h-x^3-x}{h}=\\
\dfrac{3x^2h+3xh^2+h^3+h}{h}=\\3x^2+3xh+h^2+1
8 0
3 years ago
Would each of them be able to be the side lengths of a triangle?
ratelena [41]
Pythagoras Theorem:
hipotenuse²=leg₁²+leg₂²

First posible triangle:
hypotenuse=13    (13²=169)
leg₁=12                ( 12²=144)
leg₂=5                  (5²=25)

13³=144 + 25


Answer:can be side lengths of a triangle

Second triangle:
 hypotenuse=12.6    (12.6²=158.76)
leg₁=6.7                ( 6.7²=44.89)
leg₂=6.5                  (6.5²=42.25)

leg₁²+leg₂²=44.89+42.25=87.14≠158.76

Answer: cannot be side lenghts of a triangle.

third triangle:
hypotenuse=13    (13²=169)
leg₁=12                ( 12²=144)
leg₂=11                  (11²=121)

leg₁²+leg₂²=144+121=265≠169

Answer: cannot be side lenghts of a triangle.

fourth triangle:
hypotenuse=13   (13²=169)
leg₁=6                ( 6²=36)
leg₂=4                  (4²=16)

leg₁²+leg₁²=36+16=52≠169

Answer: cannot be side lenghts of a triangle.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need anyone’s help with this APEX question! Much appreciated!
VMariaS [17]

<u>Answer:</u>

The correct answer option is D. (x - 7) + 2.

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

We are to determine whether which of the given options best describe the English expression:

<em>'two more than the quantity of a number minus seven'</em>

We can break this expression into smaller chunks to make it easier to translate.

1. two more than ---> +2

2. the quantity of a number ---> suppose the number to be 'x'

3. number minus 7 ---> (x - 7)

Combining these, we get (x - 7) + 2 so the correct answer option is D.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You try to explain the number of IBM shares traded in the stock market per day in 2005. As an independent variable you choose th
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

This is an example of

C. simultaneous causality.

Step-by-step explanation:

Simultaneous causality eliminates the conclusion that is often taken for granted to the effect that one variable is a response variable while the other is an explanatory variable because the two variables, the price and the number of shares, influence each other at the same time.  When more shares are traded than demanded in the stock market in any day, the price tends to go down, and vice versa.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of -4+15(18÷0.5)
    15·1 answer
  • Find the percentage of each number 0.9percent of 1000
    8·1 answer
  • Q1 How many whole numbers less than 1000 can be written as a product of 3 consecutive whole numbers?
    5·1 answer
  • 1. a -7 when a = 3 a + 7 = 3 + 7 = __​
    7·1 answer
  • I dont understand this
    11·2 answers
  • At the sleepover, Drew's friends ate 3 3/9 cups of ice cream. The next day, his family ate 2 4/9 cups more. How many cups did th
    5·1 answer
  • Please help I’ll give brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • Help me please and please help ASAP
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone help me solve this math equation? The answer is suppose to be 1 because that's what it says on my book but I got -1
    15·2 answers
  • Group 1
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!