Answer:
lkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Step-by-step explanation:
A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
Let us say that t is number of months and n is the number
of cases of Bangkok flu, therefore the equation we can create here is:
dn / dt = 10 t + 450
<span>where 10 represents the slope and 450 represents the
y-intercept</span>
This question includes some misspelled words; here is the correct question:
Which point of view is most likely to be unreliable in a story?
All points of view in a story are equally reliable.
The first person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
All points of view in a story are equally unreliable.
The third-person point of view is most likely to be unreliable.
The correct answer is The first-person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
Explanation:
In a narrative text, an unreliable narrator implies the narrator lies on purpose to the reader, or his/her version of the story is not completely accurate. This feature of narration occurs mainly if the story, novel, etc. includes a first-person narrator. This is because in a first-person narrator, the thoughts, feelings, and point of view of one of the characters prevail, and this causes the events told are subjective and therefore more likely to be inaccurate. Also, this does not occur if there is a third-person narrator because in this case the narrator acts as an observer and this makes it more objective.