Suppose in studying Climate Change we discover that in one country, deserts are going to be created where formerly there was grasslands and an abundance of water and in another place the coastlines are going to be altered. If you are an American, how do you think a politician is going to respond to such a problem.
Will his/her response be well thought out based on scientific preparedness, or will he (or she) grab onto the first solution suggestion to him/her and try and implement that?
Whatever he/she does, it will cost and everyone will be affected. A starting place is to find out what presidents in the past have done. During the Bush administration (the second Bush), there was an oil crisis. He responded by allocating more acreage to the growing of corn so supplementing oil production. Replaceable resources for non renewable ones. Sounded like a very good solution, but was it? As it turned out, no. He was robbing Peter to pay Paul. Thousands of people suffered (and died) with that decision because food is much more important than solving transportation problems at the expense of food.
The same is true here. If a solution is sought for global warming, politicians have to be well aware of what they are doing. And that has to be studied very carefully.
Answer:
1. Test market
2. Buzz or Word of Mouth Marketing
Explanation:
1. Test market is made up of a particular group of people who are used in checking feasibility of a product before bringing it out to the larger or general market. They are used to check how the general market would perceive the product once release. It is used in measuring consumer's response to a new product before introducing it to the larger market.
2. Buzz marketing involves or rather refers to the situation whereby a satisfied consumer/customer passes along information pertaining to a particular product to another consumer/customer. It is a situation whereby a person recommends the use of a particular products to another customer. It involves using word of mouth marketing to works in one's favour.
Answer:
Flame, Health Hazard, and Exclamation Mark
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the pictograms that need to be on the label would be the Flame, Health Hazard, and Exclamation Mark. That is because these pictograms represent the following:
Health Hazard: carcinogen, mutagenicity, Respiratory Sensitizer, Aspiration toxicity, etc.
Flame: flammable, self-heating, organic peroxides, pyrophorics, etc.
Exclamation mark: Respiratory tract irritant, Irritant, Narcotic Effect, etc.
Answer:
Statistical Section
Explanation:
The statistical section of comprehensive annual financial report contains details of most of PESTLE factors in numeric terms that shows to what extent these things will either affect or help the organization in near future.
Answer:
producers of the bags of popcorn because they will sell more to the movie theater
