1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
15

State governments must follow which type of laws?

Social Studies
2 answers:
OlgaM077 [116]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  Federal.

Explanation:

  It is known as the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution (Article VI, clause 2), it states that in a conflict between federal and state laws, the federal is the one that set the outcome.

  A federal law outline the minimum protections or requirements needed and the state laws adapted those to its own population.

  I hope this answer helps you.

LiRa [457]3 years ago
3 0
Most likely federal.
You might be interested in
What type of theorist might argue that even the definition of crime is class biased, for example, that the crimes listed in the
goblinko [34]

Answer: the correct answer is B. Conflict.

Explanation: The conflict theory sees society as the perfect play-ground for conflict to arise because groups of people compete with each other for limited resources. This separates the population into social groups each with different statuses and classes and each of them tries to dominate and oppress the other one.

<u> In this particular case, the type of theorist that might argue that even the definition of crime is class-biased is a conflict theorist because it's being suggested that a type of bias against a social class exists, inferring a type of oppression, which is very common in the conflict theories paradigm.</u>

In conclusion, the correct answer is b. Conflict.

8 0
3 years ago
Based on details in The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, Napoleon’s scholars and scientists receive the nickname "the donkeys" becau
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

your welcome

6 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
If a child is confronted about stealing cookies from a cookie jar and when the parent asks who took the cookies, the child simpl
melamori03 [73]

This is a substituting function when a child is confronted in front of his parents about stealing cookies from Jar.

<h3>What is Substituting Function in Non-Verbal Communication?</h3>

Substituting function is a replacement of verbal communication. The main role played by body structure in substituting function is Substituting is a part of non-verbal communication.

Thus, the given statement is a perfect example of the substituting function of non-verbal communication where the child is confronted by his body language in front of a parent when he steals the cookies.

Learn more about Non-verbal communication here:

brainly.com/question/23308812

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Was justice served after the Holocaust?
weeeeeb [17]
It really depends on how you look at after the fight with Germany ended we were still fighting Japan but the U.S dropped 2 atomic bombs killing over 360,000 people they did it without telling the allies because they wanted to send a message to Russia basically saying that we have these types of weapons don’t mess with us basically a flex. After the bombs were dropped the war ended but I don’t believe justice was served because the U.S committed a war crime by dropping those bombs and they did it for research purposes because as soon as the war ended they sent over researchers to go collect data on what happened and how it effected the people. There is a lot more in depth stuff that will make my argument more strong but if I type all that out I will be here all day. Over all I don’t believe justice was served but that’s everyone’s own opinion.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A study that is valid and reliable Select one: a. is called a marketing research study. b. measures subtle differences in the po
    14·1 answer
  • Which area would be most likely to have the SMALLEST population?<br> A) <br> B) <br> C) <br> D)
    13·2 answers
  • We learned that there are some limits to freedom to the press. Explain how this freedom can be limited.​
    10·1 answer
  • If you live in a district where most of the constituents support stringent immigration policies, but your senator believes in am
    8·1 answer
  • Under Federal law, stock can be tendered from which of the following accounts?
    11·1 answer
  • One significant advantage of survey research is that it can A. identify subject bias. B. be used on larger samples than other re
    12·1 answer
  • How do public safety regulations protect workers?
    7·2 answers
  • Juan's psychology professor is discussing color processing. The professor shows a solid green square on the projector and asks s
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the geographical importance of forests
    15·1 answer
  • Which major political party is described as more"to the left" or liberal? (3 points)
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!