How far would you let the government go in examining people's private lives depends on the situation at hand. When it comes to sexual incidents and murder allegations, I think it's appropriate for states to share their crime databases. These are cases that the public should be aware of because it's not every time someone walks out or gets paroled for something and never commits that crime again.
As for other crimes, I see no reason to share this. It can cause problems for the person's self-development. I also think it crosses the line of abusing power to access this information. The concept of trading privacy for security makes sense when used for legitimate purposes, but it's always gone too far and distorts your view of what it means to trade privacy for security.
Know more about privacy here
brainly.com/question/1145825
#SPJ4
Wow this is a complicated question okay. So interest is basically like the fee you pay or the bank pays you. If interest was lowered for the bank they would pay you less while if interest rates where lowered for you, you would pay less to the bank.
Answer:
1. Telegraph. Developed in the 1830s and 1840s.
2. Telephone
. Developed in 1849.
3. Radio
. Developed in the 1890s
4. Computer
. Developed between 1833 and 1871.
5. Television
. Developed in 1927
6. Computer Metworking
. The TCP/IP protocol was developed in the 1970s, and in 1972
7. Internet
. Developed in 1983 but the online world became more recognized in 1990, when the World Wide Web was invented.
<span>The confounding variable in mike's experiment is
"gender of campers".
</span>
A confounding variable is an outside impact that alters the
impact of a dependent and independent variable. This incidental impact is
utilized to impact the result of a trial design. For instance, in the event that you are examining whether
absence of activity prompts weight pick up, absence of activity is your independent
variable and weight pick up is your dependent variable. Confounding variables
are any other variable that likewise affect your dependent variable.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the landmark supreme court ruling sanctioned racial segregation.
<h3>What is the impact of Plessy v Ferguson?</h3>
Plessy V Ferguson established separate but equal provisions also known as segregation as constitutional.
The case established this principle of segregation until it was overturned in 1954.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the Plessy v. Ferguson here:
brainly.com/question/13322557
#SPJ1
