Answer:
i'd go with due process
Explanation:
The reason for this is that an impartial hearing doesn't have much to do with lifetime employment, free consent, or freedom of conscience. Then from privacy and due process, we can see that due process makes more sense because if their rights are being violated and they have an impartial hearing, this doesn't necessarily represent privacy (:
The North realized that if it did not act swiftly, the Southern states might take the precedent of the Scott case as a justification for expanding slavery into new territories and free states alike. The South recognized the threat of the Republican party and knew that the party had gained a considerable amount of support as a result of the Northern paranoia in the aftermath of the decision.
The answer for Ali is a diathesis-stress model, for Ayse is the sociocultural model. The diathesis-stress model pertains to the reason that genetic factors are the cause why we acquire mental disorders. The socio-cultural model points out that society and the culture play important roles as to why we develop mental disorders.
I think it would be C hoped this helped
