Answer:
He will be less likely to spend on scones.
Explanation:
Understanding the spending pattern requires to understand the factors involving in purchasing.
- Income: Some people live tightly, and for that they have to cut down their expenditures and that affects their spending. Jose will not have much issues although buying scones because they will not be expensive, so this relationship is negative.
- Substitution: This will probably affect the the spending of Jones on scones because he used to buy both together, and if he stops spending on coffee he will not buy scones as well.
Answer:
According to the data provided the opportunity costs is detailed below:
Initial Balance $20,000
Monthly interst $200
Investment $500
________________________
The Opportunity cost is $500
Explanation:
The opportunity cost is the price you pay for not choosing best second alternative when you make a decision. In this case the person has three options:
1. Spending the money
2. Save the money
3. Invest the money
Once the money is spent the opportunity costs is generated and it is measured by the interest rate lost for not keeping the money in the investment that will generate an interest rate of $500 monthly.
Answer:
Elastic demand
A heart valve
Explanation:
A good with many close substitutes will have a highly elastic demand. This is because an increase in the price of the good will causes the consumers to purchase one of its cheaper substitutes.
If both a diamond necklace and a heart valve for heart attack victims are priced the same, the price elasticity for the heart valve will be lower. This is because the diamond necklace is a luxury good but the heart valve is necessary for the survival of the victim.
Answer: The correct answer is "b. Unprotected lands exist inside federal parks.".
Explanation: The statement "Unprotected lands exist inside federal parks" is NOT TRUE concerning the usage of public land because there are no unprotected lands within federal parks.
Answer:
D) An illusory promise
Explanation:
An illusory promise is not enforceable. Illusory promises are simply illusions that seem or appear to a contract, but are not.
In this case, there is no consideration at all, therefore none of the parties is bound by a contract. It would be different if the company promised to pay a bonus if its profits are xx%. How can someone determine what is considered high profits, and how can you be sure that management will agree?
It is basically like telling someone else that you will give them something if you are happy and willing to do it. How can someone determine if you are happy or not, and how can someone know if you are willing to do it or not?