The answer that is being depicted above is red flag. This is
a process or a way of having to provide reasonable explanation or to alert an individual
when there is a problem that is present in means of having to let them know
about it.
Answer:
From zero to 33 boats option B would be best
Explanation:
Assuming the first alternative (A)is 250,000 fixed and 500 per boat
second (B) 2,500 cost per boat
and third (C) 50,000 fixed and 1,000 cost per boat
We want' to know at which level B would be the best option
we want to know when alternative C or A have a cost of 2,500 or lower:
A:
Q = 125
From this point, as fixed cost will be distribute among more units, the cost will decrease meaking C better than B
C:
Q = 33.33
From this point, as fixed cost will be distribute among more units, the cost will decrease meaking A better than B
From zero to 33 boats option B would be the best of the three options
Answer:
An allocation of labor (L) and capital (K) between two firms that makes the firms' isoquant curves tangent in an Edgeworth box ( C )
Explanation:
A contract curve is a curve on which the various final allocations of two goods or service between two people are represented and this could be mutually beneficial as well. hence the best description of a point that lies on an input contract curve is An allocation of labor (L) and capital (K) between two firms that makes the firms' isoquant curves tangent in an Edgeworth box
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, the question is incomplete. Indeed, there is no question at all, just a series of statements.
What we can do is to comment on this case.
We are talking about the story of Bob Bell and Michael Sharpe.
Royalties were the main reason for this dispute. Bob Bell was the engineer that invented the bicycle trailer. Michale Sharpe would focus on Marketing the product due to his experience with computers and sales. Sharpe wanted both to share the financial risks but Bell considered it hos invention and wanted more royalties. Things went in the wrong direction, the situation got worse and they both hired lawyers in Toronto, Canada.
After disputes and legal actions, Bell won the case and he could expanse his business nationwide and signed an agreement with a Chinese company to sell the product. On the other hand, Sharpe made a 180-degree turn and started a fitness business.
