It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
Answer:
Explanation:
You list the references in order of the last name of the author. For instance a book by Zachary Adam would come before a book by Adam Zachary. (Just an example)
Adam, Zachary. "Works Cited Example 1." Place of Publication: Publisher, Year.
Zachary, Adam. "Works Cited Example 2." etc.
solar it takes up the least amount of space and causes no pollution also it is unlimted
final stage in meiosis also in mitosis which that most of these are highly separated to reach to other chromsomes that divide nuclei
