The correct answer is:
Laws apply to everyone.
The rule of law indicated that the law was supposed to be applied to all people equally. In order to be used equally, it was understood that laws had to be known by everybody. Therefore laws were written to be accesible. The Twelve tables were one of the first sources of roman law.
Answer:
traditional
Explanation:
The traditional economy types are economies that tend to stick to what is known to them, and what they know for sure is functioning. The progress of these economies is slow, and they very rarely, and very gradually implement newer methods and practices. This is way it is common that in this types of economies the trade and the bartering can still be seen as used instead of money, where the people are doing it the old school way, and don't give that much of an importance to the money as a mean for trade.
Answer:
The answer is First Amendment rights, connected in light of the extraordinary qualities of the school condition, are accessible to educators and understudies. It can barely be contended that either understudies or instructors shed their established rights to the right to speak freely or articulation at the school building entryway.
Explanation:
This has been the indisputable holding of this Court for right around 50 years. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923), and Barrels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404 (1923), this Court, in sentiments by Mr. Equity Reynolds, held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment keeps States from disallowing the instructing of a remote dialect to youthful understudies. Rules to this impact, the Court held, illegally meddle with the freedom of educator, understudy, and parent. [note 2] See additionally Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 [507] (1925); West Virginia v. Barnett, 319 U.S. 624 (1943); McConnell v. Leading group of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183, 195 (1952) (agreeing feeling); Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 487 (1960); Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962); Keyishian v. Leading group of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967); Epperson v. Arkansas, stake, p. 97 (1968).
