Answer:
The primary difference between those two concepts is focus that each term has. The first one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the level of return. While the second one focus on the relationship between the level of production and the amount of factors used for that production.
Explanation:
One the one hand, the law of diminishing marginal returns is a concept known in the microeconomics theory due to the fact that it establishes the relationship between the productivity and the income for every aspect of it. Meaning that, when the productivity increases because of the increase of only one factor of production then the income will start to slowly decrease, confirming that when only one factor is increased the production will start to be incomplete and the return will decrease for that.
On the other hand, the law of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution indicates the relationship between the level of output and the different factor used to produce. Meaning that, it shows how to keep the level of output the same while making changes in the amount of factors used.
Answer:
A plant asset will add to assets and subtract from liabilities.
Explanation:
The general ledger holds all of the information needed to prepare financial statements and includes assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses.
I hope I understood the question and that this helps.
Answer:
Piper should report $308,000 as net income for the year . Option C
Explanation:
Accumulated Depreciation till 2014 = [$600,000×(5+4+3)] ÷ 15 = $ 480,000
Book Value at beginning 2015 = $600,000 - $480,000 = $120,000
Depreciation Expense in 2015 = $120,000 ÷ 2 = $60,000
Net Income before depreciation & taxes = $ 500,000
Depreciation = $ 60,000
Electronic Benefits Transfer = Net Income before depreciation & taxes - Depreciation
= $ 500,000 - $ 60,000
=$ 440000
Tax Expenses = $440,000 × 30% = $132,000
Net Income =$ 308,000
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
