1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksandrR [38]
3 years ago
6

In which document did the U.S. Congress give the president the authority "to use all necessary force against those nations, orga

nizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks" on 9/11?
a. the Terrorist Surveillance Program
b. the Authorization for Use of Military Force
c. the Military Order of November 13, 2001
d. the Presidential Proclamation
Social Studies
2 answers:
Over [174]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B. the Authorization for Use of Military Force

Explanation:

The U.S. Congress give the president the authority "to use all necessary force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks" on 9/11 in the the Authorization for Use of Military Force

Authorization for Use of Military Force is a legislature which was passed by the Senate and House of Representatives and was also approved to become a law by the president effective from September 18, 2001.

The law gives the full permission to use the United States Armed forces against all those who were involved in the September 11 attack in the United States. This law is also said to be granting permission for the use against the militant group and al-Qaeda terrorist group.

eduard3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the Authorization for Use of Military Force

Explanation:

The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) fWAS made a law in September of 2001, after a resolution was reached by the congress of the United States of America, approving the use of armed forces of the country, against the people behind the attack of September 11 attacks. This authority was given to the president after the 107th Congress Passed it and President George W. Bush signed it into law.

You might be interested in
Strengths and weaknesses of the confederation. in essay form.<br>Big money. 84 coins
goldfiish [28.3K]
The Articles of Confederation can be referred to as the first ‘constitution’ of the United States and set out how the Federal government was to run, including implementation of United States of America, as a certified name for the new nation. The Articles were in exercise start starting 1777 following the Second Continental Congress appointment a committee to outline the Articles in June 1776 and prepared the draft to the states for endorsement in November 1777. The Articles was produced by the legislative body of the states which participated in the Second Continental Congress from a perceived call to have “an understanding with confederacy for securing the independence, sovereignty, and freedom of the United States” (Bailyn) The document enclosed 13 articles. It establishes that the confederation was to be referred to as: “The United States of America.” It also asserts the parity of the broken up states with the confederation administration such that “every state retains its freedom, self-government, sovereignty, and its power, authority, and right, which should not be explicitly delegated by the Confederation. “In addition the article do not identify the United States of America a “state” or “government,” yet instead say, that the said States hereby severally go into into a solid group of friendship with each one for their joint and common interests, common protection, and the safety of their liberties, strengthening the relationship among themselves to help out each other, in opposition to all might offered to, their mutual and general welfare or any of them, on relation to religious conviction, dominion, business, or any other simulation whatsoever. “It establishes liberty of movement as anybody may possibly pass unreservedly in any of the states, not including “vagabonds, paupers, and fugitives from fair dealing.” In the article all people are entitled to the rights recognized by the state into which he moves. In case a wrong is committed in a single state and the person responsible for the action flee to another state, he will be taken to and tried in the same Nation in which he/she committed the crime. The article allocates a single chance to each state to cast their votes in the assembly of the union (the “United States in congress Assembled”) this was allowed to a designation of involving two to seven members. Assembly members were selected by state legislature. Also, persons could not serve other than three out of whichever six years. it also; states that the Articles are everlasting, and can only be changed by consent of Congress with approval by all the state legislatures, it reassures that the Confederation agrees with war debt incurred by Congress previous to the existence of the Articles, it also define a team of the States to be a rule while Congress is not in sitting, it also does state the powers accorded to the United States of America: to set weights, to announce war and procedures (as well as coins), and for Congress to serve as the highest court for settling differences between states, it also says that spending by the United States of America shall be paid by finances raised by state legislatures, and based on the real property values shall be apportioned to each of the states .In the article, Only the central government was permitted to carry out foreign dealings and to pronounce war. No single state could have its navy or standing armies could engage in war without the consent of Congress (even though the state militia’s existence was encouraged). Each time the military is raised for general defense, military and colonels ranks below colonel would be named by the state legislatures.” The Articles were later on replaced with the more comprehensive the United States Constitution (Mcgeehan)

I hope this helped if it did pls mark as brainest
Have a lovely day
6 0
2 years ago
How did OPEC wield its power in 1973?
ziro4ka [17]
The answer is c you are welcome
4 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLZZ I NEED HELP WITH THIS IS IMPORTANT (IT IS NOT C)
Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Write about how news papers allow us to preserve culture/ record important cultural events and add a pi
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Since 1896, The New York Times has printed the phrase “All the News That’s Fit to Print” as its masthead motto. The phrase itself seems innocent enough, and it has been published for such a long time now that many probably skim over it without giving it a second thought. Yet, the phrase represents an interesting phenomenon in the newspaper industry: control. Papers have long been criticized for the way stories are presented, yet newspapers continue to print—and readers continue to buy them.

In 1997, The New York Times publicly claimed that it was “an independent newspaper, entirely fearless, free of ulterior influence and unselfishly devoted to the public welfare (Herman, 1998).” Despite this public proclamation of objectivity, the paper’s publishers have been criticized for choosing which articles to print based on personal financial gain. In reaction to that statement, scholar Edward S. Herman wrote that the issue is that The New York Times “defin[es] public welfare in a manner acceptable to their elite audience and advertisers (Herman, 1998).” The New York Times has continually been accused of determining what stories are told. For example, during the 1993 debate over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The New York Times clearly supported the agreement. In doing so, the newspaper exercised editorial control over its publication and the information that went out to readers.

However, The New York Times is not the only newspaper to face accusations of controlling which stories are told. In his review of Read All About It: The Corporate Takeover of America’s Newspapers, Steve Hoenisch, editor of Criticism.com, offers these harsh words about what drives the stories printed in today’s newspapers:

I’ve always thought of daily newspapers as the guardians of our—meaning the public’s—right to know. The guardians of truth, justice, and public welfare and all that. But who am I fooling? America’s daily newspapers don’t belong to us. Nor, for that matter, do they even seek to serve us any longer. They have more important concerns now: appeasing advertisers and enriching stockholders (Hoenisch).

More and more, as readership declines, newspapers must answer to advertisers and shareholders as they choose which stories to report on.

However, editorial control does not end there. Journalists determine not only what stories are told but also how those stories are presented. This issue is perhaps even more delicate than that of selection. Most newspaper readers still expect news to be reported objectively and demand that journalists present their stories in this manner. However, careful public scrutiny can burden journalists, while accusations of controlling information affect their affiliated newspapers. However, this scrutiny takes on importance as the public turns to journalists and newspapers to learn about the world.

Journalists are also expected to hold themselves to high standards of truth and originality. Fabrication and plagiarism are prohibited. If a journalist is caught using these tactics, then his or her career is likely to end for betraying the public’s trust and for damaging the publication’s reputation. For example, The New York Times reporter Jayson Blair lost his job in 2003 when his plagiary and fabrication were discovered, and The New Republic journalist Stephen Glass was fired in 1998 for inventing stories, quotes, and sources.

Despite the critiques of the newspaper industry and its control over information, the majority of newspapers and journalists take their roles seriously. Editors work with journalists to verify sources and to double-check facts so readers are provided accurate information. In this way, the control that journalists and newspapers exert serves to benefit their readers, who can then be assured that articles printed are correct.

The New York Times Revisits Old Stories

Despite the criticism of The New York Times, the famous newspaper has been known to revisit their old stories to provide a new, more balanced view. One such example occurred in 2004 when, in response to criticism on their handling of the Iraq War, The New York Times offered a statement of apology. The apology read:

We have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged. Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged—or failed to emerge (New York Times, 2004).

Although the apology was risky—it essentially admitted guilt in controlling a controversial story—The New York Times demonstrated a commitment to ethical journalism.

4 0
3 years ago
What did President more order Andrew Jackson to do in 1818?what did Jackson do instead?
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

Instead Jackson invaded Flordia and went to the military sites and shut them down, killed 2 people and replaced spanish government with an American. Explain the deal that the United States made with Spain in 1819 to end the conflict over Florida.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A field researcher who studies lions conjectured that the more time a cub spends playing, the sooner the cub will begin to hunt.
    11·1 answer
  • How did new farming methods contribute to the growth of medieval European towns?
    15·1 answer
  • In 1732 James Oglethorpe helped defend Georgia from an invasion by
    12·1 answer
  • What was the difference between the direct democracy in Athens and the representative democracy of the United States?
    6·1 answer
  • In Hamlet’s famous speech, sometimes referred to as the "What a piece of work is a man," what is the philosophical belief held b
    5·1 answer
  • The articulation of national interest and the means chosen to secure those interests, both material and ideational in the intern
    6·1 answer
  • What is the term for the arbitrary rule that automatically places the children of a union between members of different socioecon
    14·1 answer
  • When a person is asked a question about a political issue that he or she has little interest in and has not thought much about,
    5·1 answer
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Chuge%5Csf%5Cfbox%5Cred%20%7BLeaving%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\huge\sf\fbox\red {Leaving}
    9·2 answers
  • Class difference is one of the major causes of social problems.justify<br> plz give long answer ​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!