1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nlexa [21]
3 years ago
15

Why did the franks raid?

History
2 answers:
ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
6 0
From the 5th century CE onwards, as Roman power declined in northern Gaul, the Franks expanded into Belgium and northern France. Later on, the Franks resumed their expansion process and, by the first half of the 6th century CE, they gained control over part of central and southern France and a small portion of northern Spain. During their interaction with the Romans, the Franks raided the Roman Empire on numerous occasions, but some of the Franks also served as soldiers in the Roman army.
Alexxx [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

what?I don't know sorry

You might be interested in
Write a few opening lines that you think Wilson could have used to introduce his Fourteen Points.
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

di ko po Alam sorry

4 0
2 years ago
Plz answer these two questions
topjm [15]
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values." These are one of the reasons why they should promote democracy aboard
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were Southern soldiers called? A) Billy Yanks B) Johnny Reb C) Union Clinchers D) Mighty Militia
Contact [7]

Answer:

the answer is b johnny reb

3 0
3 years ago
I'm not sure what the answer to this question is
Valentin [98]
C      i think is the answer cause he did all the others except for answer c.
3 0
3 years ago
Based on the information in this chart, which situation gave rise to Nazi power in Germany?
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

mostly WW1

Explanation:

germany was in deep debt to every allied country after the war, plus they had tons of limitations put on them by the allies and the treaty of Versailles, so hitler used all of that as an excuse to create a totalitarian regime

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help!!
    13·1 answer
  • What earlier prophets does Islam accept
    7·1 answer
  • How did the qin dynasty unify and expand china
    14·1 answer
  • When was the treaty of Paris which officially ended the revolutionary war with the British signed ?
    11·2 answers
  • Someone help I need this ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ FAST!! WILL GIVE BRAILIESTWhat facts about Africa would you include in your oral report on its geography
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a key goal of Georgia's prison reform movement?
    14·2 answers
  • Directions. Use the word bank to match the physical features with their numbers/letters on the map.
    15·1 answer
  • each political party has a county, state, and national committee. which phrase best explains the main purpose of the state party
    6·2 answers
  • One way citizens can recognize (BLANK) is by paying attention to a variety of media sources, radio, mail flyers, and the newspap
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!