HL Theorem would prove these two triangles are congruent.


side note: multiplying by the LCD of both sides is just to get rid of the denominators
Given this equation:

That represents t<span>he height of a tree in feet over (x) years. Let's analyze each statement according to figure 1 that shows the graph of this equation.
</span>
The tree's maximum height is limited to 30 ft.
As shown in figure below, the tree is not limited, so this statement is false.
<span>
The tree is initially 2 ft tall
The tree was planted in x = 0, so evaluating the function for this value, we have:
</span>

<span>
<span>So, the tree is initially

tall.
</span>
Therefore this statement is false.
</span>
Between the 5th and 7th years, the tree grows approximately 7 ft.
<span>
if x = 5 then:
</span>

<span>
</span>if x = 7 then:

So, between the 5th and 7th years the height of the tree remains constant
:

This is also a false statement.
<span>
After growing 15 ft, the tree's rate of growth decreases.</span>
It is reasonable to think that the height of this tree finally will be 301ft. Why? well, if x grows without bound, then the term

approaches zero.
Therefore this statement is also false.
Conclusion: After being planted this tree won't grow.
Answer:
The answer is A!
Step-by-step explanation:
Its correct, I took the quiz :)
Answer:
The pattern. 1, 4, 9, 16, … has no common difference. An explicit pattern rule is a pattern rule that tells you how to get any term in the pattern without listing all the terms before it. For example, an explicit pattern rule for 5, 8, 11, 14, … uses the first term (5) and the common difference (3).