Answer:
Based on the reconstructed temperatures, precipitation changes, and occurrences of extreme climate events, together with historical records on fiscal deterioration, food crises, and the frequencies of popular unrest, rebellions and wars, we identified three principal ways in which climate change contributed to the collapse in the Ming dynasty. Firstly, cooling, aridification, and desertification during a cold period destroyed the military farm system, which was the main supply system for the provisioning of government troops on the northern frontiers; these impacts increased the military expenditure from 64 % of total government expenditure in 1548–1569 to 76 % in 1570–1589 and thus aggravated the national fiscal crisis that occurred during the late Ming dynasty. Secondly, climate deterioration (e.g., cooling, aridification, and an increase in the frequencies of frost- and drought-related disasters, etc.) led to a 20–50 % reduction in the per capita production of raw grain in most areas of China, which resulted in widespread food crises and exacerbated the vulnerability of social structures during the last several decades of the Ming dynasty
Explanation:
Answer:
A proton is a subatomic particle with symbol p or p+ .It has a positive charge and has a mass slightly less than that of neutron .
Mas =
kilograms
Explanation:
Answer:
Mansa Musa was one of the greatest kings of Mali. He became popular in African history, not only for his contributions to imperial territorial expansion and development, but also for the international recognition he gained for the empire during his pilgrimage to Mecca during 1324-1325.
hope this helped :)
Answer:c. "There are many reasons for misbehavior, but no excuses
Explanation:
Constructive assertiveness is meant to be positive all the time. A teacher who has constructive assertiveness doesn't attack their students or make them feel inferior.
Assertiveness doesn't include being argumentative and hostile towards the students and accusing them but it focuses on building respect towards the process of learning.
A teacher with assertiveness determine the problem and clearly explains to the students why that particular situation is a problem.
This is done so that a student doesn't feel accused but focuses on what the problem is otherwise the student may become defensive when they feel accused.
"There are many reasons for misbehavior, but no excuses
This statement is meant to make a student understand that nomatter how they feel but they still need to abide by the rules otherwise they will have to be accountable for their own behavior.
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>1</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>The most fundamental principle of justice—one that has been widely accepted since it was first defined by Aristotle more than two thousand years ago—is the principle that "equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally." In its contemporary form, this principle is sometimes expressed as follows: "Individuals should be treated the same, unless they differ in ways that are relevant to the situation in which they are involved." For example, if Jack and Jill both do the same work, and there are no relevant differences between them or the work they are doing, then in justice they should be paid the same wages. And if Jack is paid more than Jill simply because he is a man, or because he is white, then we have an injustice—a form of discrimination—because race and sex are not relevant to normal work situations.</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>2</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Social</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>privilege</u></em></h2>
<em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>Social privilege is a theory of special advantage or entitlement, used to one's own benefit or to the detriment of others. These groups can be advantaged based on social class, age, height, nationality, disability, ethnic or racial category, gender, gender identity, neurology, sexual orientation, and religion.It is generally considered to be a theoretical concept used in a variety of subjects and often linked to social inequality.Privilege is also linked to social and cultural forms of power.It began as an academic concept, but has since been invoked more widely, outside of academia.</em>
<h2>
<em><u>Question-3</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Racism has been—and unfortunately still is—such a prominent feature of so many human societies that it might be tempting to think of it as somehow "natural" or "innate."</u></em></h2><h2 /><h2>
<em><u>Racism has been—and unfortunately still is—such a prominent feature of so many human societies that it might be tempting to think of it as somehow "natural" or "innate."Indeed, this is the conclusion that some evolutionary psychologists have come to. Evolutionary psychology tries to account for present-day human traits in terms of the survival benefit they might have had to our ancestors. If a trait has survived and become prevalent, then the genes associated with it must have been "selected" by evolution.</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>_</u></em><em><u>4</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>The Veil of Ignorance, a component of social contract theory, allows us to test ideas for fairness.</u></em></h2>
<em><u>Like many thought experiments, the Veil of Ignorance could never be carried out in the literal sense, nor should it be. Its purpose is to explore ideas about justice, morality, equality, and social status in a structured manner.</u></em>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>5</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, protects employees and job applicants from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>6</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>They’re surrounded by pieces of the puzzle, but can’t put them together</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>7</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias that assumes that "people get what they deserve" - that actions will have morally fair and fitting consequences for the actor. For example, the assumptions that noble actions will eventually be rewarded and evil actions will eventually be punished fall under this hypothesis. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of— either a universal force that restores moral balance or a universal connection between the nature of actions and their results. This belief generally implies the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, and/or order. It is often associated with a variety of fundamental fallacies, especially in regard to rationalizing suffering on the grounds that the sufferers "deserve" it.</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em><u>Question</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u>8</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>In game theory terminology, interpersonal trust is associated with the 'type' of the other players (or his own disposition to believe other players), while the institutional trust is related to the rules of the game.</u></em></h2>
<h2>
<em>Hop</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> helps</em><em> you</em><em> ❤️</em></h2>
<h2>
<em>Mark</em><em> me</em><em> as</em><em> brainliest</em><em> ❤️</em></h2>