Answer: FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC)
Explanation:
Decisions made by the Department of Enforcement may be appealed to FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC).
The NAC is the national committee established to recheck or review initial pronouncements or decisions made in FINRA’s Department of Enforcements proceedings.
An individual or firm is given the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC under FINRA's disciplinary procedures. Sometimes the NAC may initiate a review of a decision on its own.
In the process of appeal, the NAC will evaluate whether the hearing panel's findings are right in legal context or not and in accordance with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines.
During a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction of the former proceeding on an individual or firm is not enforced.
However, an individual or firm can further appeal FINRA's decision to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and then to federal court.
Answer:
The answer is comparison with alternatives.
Explanation:
This component is based on the idea that a partner is more likely to commit to a relationship is there seems to be no better alternative.
The person may ask him/herself if there is another way to satisfy his/her needs. In this case, the alternative is ending the relationship and staying alone, or find another partner.
Pill,Pilgrim,and Pimple are the answers
Answer:
The anwer is the availability heuristic.
Explanation:
The availability heuristic is a thinking bias that occurs when a person reccurs to immediately aviable, usually recent information to back up his thoughts or beliefs.
In the example, Mariah is assuming that her two best friends' situation can be applied for a larger population, <u>simply because that's the available information for her</u>.
