If a human brain is not flexible, it will be a lot more limited than it already is. In another way of looking at it, you can even say that if it does not expand, it is only a box or a storage. Our brains do not only work as storage of information! We also use our brains for thinking etc. If it is rigid, when a lad hit you accidentally on the face with a paper, you may resort to violent retaliation.
Brains should be adaptable on the grounds that on the off chance that they weren't we could never have the capacity to expand our astuteness. Individuals are more adaptable mentally on the grounds that we can turn our hands to more mind boggling things and can learn better.
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
He discussed for democracy, but not for freedom, appealing
that anyone who differs with the general will should be involuntary to monitor
it. He appears to be supporting something like an "absolute
democracy" with complete civil equality, a factual democracy before a
republic, and he openly says that political parties would weaken or disintegrate
a political system founded on the general will.
A dictatorship crashes with this wholly for the reason that whoever governs
the country is not governmentally equal with the rest of the individuals and
can create an oppression of an individual or party. He is disagreeing for a tyranny of the
majority.
Do what u need to do with assignments don’t do extra for nothing lol
