The answer is F
I hope I helped. Brainliest would be appreciated.
Answer:
Joseph is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
I cannot see the options in the drop-down menus. Even though, Joseph is correct because the difference between the longest length (which is 12 ft) and shortest length (which is 9 1/2 ft) is 12 - 9 1/2 = 2 1/2 ft. It doesn't matter how many ropes measure those lengths.
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
Whole numbers are positive numbers (this includes 0) that do not have decimals or fractions to them.
Example:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,etc are all whole numbers, because they are positive and do not have decimals or fractions
1.25 would not be a whole number, because although it is positive, it has a decimal.
Answer:
The formula is 10 - 3n
Step-by-step explanation:
For an nth term in an arithmetic sequence
U( n ) = a + ( n - 1)d
Where n is the number of terms
a is the first term
d is the common difference
From the sequence above
a = 7
d = 4 - 7 = - 3
The formula for an nth term is
U(n) = 7 + (n - 1)-3
= 7 - 3n + 3
The final answer is
= 10 - 3n
Hope this helps you.