Answer:
<h3>true or if i wrong fulse so </h3>
Answer:
Journalize the transactions is given below
Explanation:
given data
Issued = 66,500 shares
cash = $6 per share
Issued = 41,500 shares
cash = $8 per share
solution
we get here Journalize the transactions
and we assuming that the common stock has a par value of $6 per share
so
Jan. 10 cash is 66,500 × 6 = 399000
and cash for July 1 is = 41,500 × 8 = 332000
and common stock = 41,500 × 6 = 249000
paid in capital excess = 332000 - 249000 = 83000
Date Account Titles Debit Credit
Jan. 10 cash 399000
common stock 399000
July 1 cash 332000
common stock 249000
paid in capital excess 83000
Answer:
qualified acquisition debt = $750,000
qualified home equity debt = $0
Explanation:
Qualified acquisition debt refers to the debt incurred to purchase or build your home. In this case, Cary and Bill are allowed to itemize the interests paid for up to $750,000 of the acquisition debt ($375,000 if filing separately). This limit was reduced due to the TCJA of 2017, and will remain in place until 2025. After 2025, the limit will return to the normal $1,000,000.
Certain amount of interests on qualified home equity loans will also return in 2025, but currently they are not deductible.
Answer:
maintenance phase
Explanation:
Maintenance phase -
It refers to the phase of making the changes in the software , hardware and documentation to improve the operations effectively , is referred to as the maintenance phase .
The phase is important , as it enhances the efficiency and corrects the problem .
The company or the organisation tries to invest the maximum amount in the maintenance phase .
Hence , from the given statement of the question,
The correct option is maintenance phase .
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
